首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Comparison of the treatment practice and hospitalization cost of percutaneous coronary intervention between a teaching hospital and a general hospital in Malaysia: A cross sectional study
【2h】

Comparison of the treatment practice and hospitalization cost of percutaneous coronary intervention between a teaching hospital and a general hospital in Malaysia: A cross sectional study

机译:马来西亚教学医院与综合医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的治疗实践和住院费用比较:一项横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionThe increasing disease burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) calls for sustainable cardiac service. Teaching hospitals and general hospitals in Malaysia are main providers of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a common treatment for CAD. Few studies have analyzed the contemporary data on local cardiac facilities. Service expansion and budget allocation require cost evidence from various providers. We aim to compare the patient characteristics, procedural outcomes, and cost profile between a teaching hospital (TH) and a general hospital (GH).
机译:简介冠状动脉疾病(CAD)不断增加的疾病负担要求可持续的心脏服务。马来西亚的教学医院和综合医院是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的主要提供者,这是CAD的常见治疗方法。很少有研究分析有关当地心脏设施的当代数据。服务扩展和预算分配需要各种提供商的成本证据。我们旨在比较教学医院(TH)和综合医院(GH)之间的患者特征,程序结果和费用概况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号