首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Using data from respondent-driven sampling studies to estimate the number of people who inject drugs: Application to the Kohtla-Järve region of Estonia
【2h】

Using data from respondent-driven sampling studies to estimate the number of people who inject drugs: Application to the Kohtla-Järve region of Estonia

机译:使用来自受访者驱动的抽样研究的数据来估计注射毒品的人数:在爱沙尼亚Kohtla-Järve地区的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Estimating the size of key risk populations is essential for determining the resources needed to implement effective public health intervention programs. Several standard methods for population size estimation exist, but the statistical and practical assumptions required for their use may not be met when applied to HIV risk groups. We apply three approaches to estimate the number of people who inject drugs (PWID) in the Kohtla-Järve region of Estonia using data from a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) study: the standard “multiplier” estimate gives 654 people (95% CI 509–804), the “successive sampling” method gives estimates between 600 and 2500 people, and a network-based estimate that uses the RDS recruitment chain gives between 700 and 2800 people. We critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of these statistical approaches for estimating the size of hidden or hard-to-reach HIV risk groups.
机译:估算关键风险人群的规模对于确定实施有效的公共卫生干预计划所需的资源至关重要。存在几种用于人口规模估计的标准方法,但是将其用于艾滋病毒风险人群时,可能无法满足其使用所需的统计和实际假设。我们采用三种方法来估计爱沙尼亚Kohtla-Järve地区的注射毒品人数(PWID),方法是使用响应者驱动抽样(RDS)研究的数据:标准的“乘数”估计值为654人(95%CI 509–804),“成功抽样”方法得出的估计数为600至2500人,而使用RDS招聘链的基于网络的估计则得出的结果为700至2800人。我们将严格评估这些统计方法的优缺点,以估计隐藏或难以达到的HIV风险人群的规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号