首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Evaluation of Four Methods for Predicting Carbon Stocks of Korean Pine Plantations in Heilongjiang Province, China
【2h】

Evaluation of Four Methods for Predicting Carbon Stocks of Korean Pine Plantations in Heilongjiang Province, China

机译:黑龙江省红松人工林碳储量四种预测方法的评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 89 trees of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) were destructively sampled from the plantations in Heilongjiang Province, P.R. China. The sample trees were measured and calculated for the biomass and carbon stocks of tree components (i.e., stem, branch, foliage and root). Both compatible biomass and carbon stock models were developed with the total biomass and total carbon stocks as the constraints, respectively. Four methods were used to evaluate the carbon stocks of tree components. The first method predicted carbon stocks directly by the compatible carbon stocks models (Method 1). The other three methods indirectly predicted the carbon stocks in two steps: (1) estimating the biomass by the compatible biomass models, and (2) multiplying the estimated biomass by three different carbon conversion factors (i.e., carbon conversion factor 0.5 (Method 2), average carbon concentration of the sample trees (Method 3), and average carbon concentration of each tree component (Method 4)). The prediction errors of estimating the carbon stocks were compared and tested for the differences between the four methods. The results showed that the compatible biomass and carbon models with tree diameter (D) as the sole independent variable performed well so that Method 1 was the best method for predicting the carbon stocks of tree components and total. There were significant differences among the four methods for the carbon stock of stem. Method 2 produced the largest error, especially for stem and total. Methods 3 and Method 4 were slightly worse than Method 1, but the differences were not statistically significant. In practice, the indirect method using the mean carbon concentration of individual trees was sufficient to obtain accurate carbon stocks estimation if carbon stocks models are not available.
机译:从中国黑龙江省的人工林中破坏性取样了总共89棵红松(Pinus koraiensis)树。测量并计算样本树木的树木成分(即茎,枝,叶和根)的生物量和碳储量。建立了兼容的生物质和碳库模型,分别以总生物量和总碳库为约束。四种方法用于评估树木成分的碳储量。第一种方法是通过兼容的碳库模型直接预测碳库(方法1)。其他三种方法分两步间接预测碳储量:(1)通过兼容的生物量模型估算生物量,(2)将估算的生物量乘以三个不同的碳转化因子(即碳转化因子0.5(方法2)) ,样本树的平均碳浓度(方法3)和每种树成分的平均碳浓度(方法4))。比较了估算碳储量的预测误差,并测试了四种方法之间的差异。结果表明,以树木直径(D)为唯一独立变量的兼容生物量和碳模型表现良好,因此方法1是预测树木成分和总碳储量的最佳方法。四种茎干碳储量方法之间存在显着差异。方法2产生最大的误差,尤其是对于茎和总误差。方法3和方法4比方法1稍差,但差异无统计学意义。在实践中,如果没有可用的碳库模型,则使用单个树木的平均碳浓度的间接方法足以获得准确的碳库估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号