首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Nicotine Increases Impulsivity and Decreases Willingness to Exert Cognitive Effort despite Improving Attention in “Slacker” Rats: Insights into Cholinergic Regulation of Cost/Benefit Decision Making
【2h】

Nicotine Increases Impulsivity and Decreases Willingness to Exert Cognitive Effort despite Improving Attention in “Slacker” Rats: Insights into Cholinergic Regulation of Cost/Benefit Decision Making

机译:尽管提高了“懒惰”大鼠的注意力,但尼古丁提高了冲动并降低了进行认知努力的意愿:对成本/收益决策的胆碱能调节的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Successful decision making in our daily lives requires weighing an option’s costs against its associated benefits. The neuromodulator acetylcholine underlies both the etiology and treatment of a number of illnesses in which decision making is perturbed, including Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia. Nicotine acts on the cholinergic system and has been touted as a cognitive enhancer by both smokers and some researchers for its attention-boosting effects; however, it is unclear whether treatments that have a beneficial effect on attention would also have a beneficial effect on decision making. Here we utilize the rodent Cognitive Effort Task (rCET), wherein animals can choose to allocate greater visuospatial attention for a greater reward, to examine cholinergic contributions to both attentional performance and choice based on attentional demand. Following the establishment of baseline behavior, four drug challenges were administered: nicotine, mecamylamine, scopolamine, and oxotremorine (saline plus three doses for each). As per previous rCET studies, animals were divided by their baseline preferences, with “worker” rats choosing high-effort/high-reward options more than their “slacker” counterparts. Nicotine caused slackers to choose even fewer high-effort trials than at baseline, but had no effect on workers’ choice. Despite slackers’ decreased willingness to expend effort, nicotine improved their attentional performance on the task. Nicotine also increased measures of motor impulsivity in all animals. In contrast, scopolamine decreased animals’ choice of high-effort trials, especially for workers, while oxotremorine decreased motor impulsivity for all animals. In sum, the cholinergic system appears to contribute to decision making, and in part these contributions can be understood as a function of individual differences. While nicotine has been considered as a cognitive enhancer, these data suggest that its modest benefits to attention may be coupled with impulsiveness and decreased willingness to work hard, especially in individuals who are particularly sensitive to effort costs (i.e. slackers).
机译:要在我们的日常生活中成功做出决策,就需要权衡购股权的成本和相关收益。神经调节剂乙酰胆碱是许多疾病的病因学和治疗方法,这些疾病会影响决策,包括阿尔茨海默氏病,注意力缺陷/多动症和精神分裂症。尼古丁作用于胆碱能系统,并被吸烟者和一些研究人员吹捧为促进认知的认知增强剂。然而,尚不清楚对注意力产生有益影响的治疗是否也会对决策产生有益影响。在这里,我们利用啮齿动物的认知努力任务(rCET),其中动物可以选择分配更大的视觉空间注意力以获得更大的回报,以检查胆碱能对注意力表现和基于注意力需求的选择的贡献。建立基线行为后,进行了四次药物挑战:尼古丁,美卡敏胺,东pol碱和奥曲莫林(盐水加三剂)。根据先前的rCET研究,将动物按其基线偏好进行划分,“努力”大鼠比“较懒惰”的大鼠更多选择努力/高回报的选择。尼古丁使懈怠的人选择的高强度试验比基线时少,但对工人的选择没有影响。尽管懒惰者减少了付出努力的意愿,但尼古丁提高了他们在任务上的注意力表现。尼古丁还增加了所有动物运动冲动的量度。相比之下,东decreased碱减少了动物对高强度试验的选择,特别是对工人而言,而氧代苯丙氨酸可降低所有动物的运动冲动。总而言之,胆碱能系统似乎有助于决策,并且这些贡献可以部分地理解为个体差异的函数。尽管尼古丁被认为是一种认知增强剂,但这些数据表明尼古丁对注意力的适度益处可能与冲动和努力工作的意愿降低有关,特别是在对工作成本特别敏感的人(即懒惰者)中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号