首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Why Do Species Co-Occur? A Test of Alternative Hypotheses Describing Abiotic Differences in Sympatry versus Allopatry Using Spadefoot Toads
【2h】

Why Do Species Co-Occur? A Test of Alternative Hypotheses Describing Abiotic Differences in Sympatry versus Allopatry Using Spadefoot Toads

机译:为什么会同时发生物种?使用Spa脚蟾蜍测试描述共生和异相的非生物差异的替代假设的测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Areas of co-occurrence between two species (sympatry) are often thought to arise in regions where abiotic conditions are conducive to both species and are therefore intermediate between regions where either species occurs alone (allopatry). Depending on historical factors or interactions between species, however, sympatry might not differ from allopatry, or, alternatively, sympatry might actually be more extreme in abiotic conditions relative to allopatry. Here, we evaluate these three hypothesized patterns for how sympatry compares to allopatry in abiotic conditions. We use two species of congeneric spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata and S. bombifrons, as our study system. To test these hypotheses, we created ecological niche models (specifically using Maxent) for both species to create a map of the joint probability of occurrence of both species. Using the results of these models, we identified three types of locations: two where either species was predicted to occur alone (i.e., allopatry for S. multiplicata and allopatry for S. bombifrons) and one where both species were predicted to co-occur (i.e., sympatry). We then compared the abiotic environment between these three location types and found that sympatry was significantly hotter and drier than the allopatric regions. Thus, sympatry was not intermediate between the alternative allopatric sites. Instead, sympatry occurred at one extreme of the conditions occupied by both species. We hypothesize that biotic interactions in these extreme environments facilitate co-occurrence. Specifically, hybridization between S. bombifrons females and S. multiplicata males may facilitate co-occurrence by decreasing development time of tadpoles. Additionally, the presence of alternative food resources in more extreme conditions may preclude competitive exclusion of one species by the other. This work has implications for predicting how interacting species will respond to climate change, because species interactions may facilitate survival in extreme habitats.
机译:通常认为两种物种(共生)之间同时存在的区域出现在非生物条件有利于两种物种的区域中,因此位于两种物种单独发生的区域之间(异位症)。但是,取决于历史因素或物种之间的相互作用,共生可能与异典无关,或者,在非生物条件下,共生实际上可能比异典更加极端。在这里,我们评估这三种假设的模式,以比较在非生物条件下对称性与异位症的比较。我们使用两种同类的spa脚蟾蜍(Spea multiplicata)和S. bombifrons作为我们的研究系统。为了检验这些假设,我们为两个物种创建了生态位模型(专门使用Maxent),以创建两个物种共同发生概率的图。利用这些模型的结果,我们确定了三种类型的位置:两种类型的一个物种被预测为单独发生(即,对于多链球菌而言是同种异体的,而对S. bombifrons而言,这是同种异体的),另外一种则认为这两种物种同时存在(即共象征)。然后,我们比较了这三种位置类型之间的非生物环境,发现交联处比异特异地域明显更热更干燥。因此,交联术不是在其他异位部位之间的。取而代之的是,共生发生在两个物种所占据的极端情况下。我们假设在这些极端环境中的生物相互作用会促进共现。特别地,在S. bombifrons雌性和S. multiplia雄性之间的杂交可通过减少of的发育时间来促进共生。此外,在更极端的条件下存在替代粮食资源可能会阻止一种物种被另一种竞争性排斥。这项工作对于预测相互作用的物种将如何应对气候变化具有重要意义,因为物种的相互作用可能会促进极端栖息地的生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号