首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study
【2h】

Testing Hardy-Weinberg Proportions in a Frequency-Matched Case-Control Genetic Association Study

机译:在频率匹配的病例对照遗传关联研究中测试Hardy-Weinberg比例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some interest in studying genetic variants associated with secondary phenotypes. In genetic association studies, the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportion (HWP) of each genetic marker is assessed as an initial quality check to identify questionable genotypes. Generally, HWP tests are performed based on the controls for the primary disease or secondary phenotype. However, when the disease or phenotype of interest is common, the controls do not represent the general population. Therefore, using only controls for testing HWP can result in a highly inflated type I error rate for the disease- and/or phenotype-associated variants. Recently, two approaches, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach and the mixture HWP (mHWP) exact test were proposed for testing HWP in samples from case-control studies. Here, we show that these two approaches result in inflated type I error rates and could lead to the removal from further analysis of potential causal genetic variants associated with the primary disease and/or secondary phenotype when the study of primary disease is frequency-matched on the secondary phenotype. Therefore, we proposed alternative approaches, which extend the LRT and mHWP approaches, for assessing HWP that account for frequency matching. The goal was to maintain more (possible causative) single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sample for further analysis. Our simulation results showed that both extended approaches could control type I error probabilities. We also applied the proposed approaches to test HWP for SNPs from a genome-wide association study of lung cancer that was frequency-matched on smoking status and found that the proposed approaches can keep more genetic variants for association studies.
机译:在病例对照遗传关联研究中,病例是患有该疾病的受试者,而对照是没有该疾病的受试者。在病例对照数据收集时,还将收集有关次要表型的信息。除了对原发疾病的研究之外,对研究与继发表型有关的遗传变异也有一些兴趣。在遗传关联研究中,评估每个遗传标记与Hardy-Weinberg比例(HWP)的偏差作为初始质量检查,以鉴定可疑的基因型。通常,基于原发疾病或继发表型的对照进行HWP测试。但是,当所关注的疾病或表型常见时,对照并不代表一般人群。因此,仅使用测试HWP的对照可导致与疾病和/或表型相关的变异的I型错误率大大提高。最近,提出了两种方法,即似然比检验(LRT)方法和混合HWP(mHWP)精确检验来测试病例对照研究中的样本中的HWP。在这里,我们表明这两种方法会导致I型错误率上升,并且当对原发性疾病的研究频率与次要的表型。因此,我们提出了替代方法,该方法扩展了LRT和mHWP方法,用于评估考虑频率匹配的HWP。目的是在样品中维持更多(可能的原因)单核苷酸多态性,以供进一步分析。我们的仿真结果表明,两种扩展方法都可以控制I型错误概率。我们还从肺癌的全基因组关联研究中应用了拟议的方法对HNP的SNP进行测试,该研究在吸烟状况上呈频率匹配,并发现拟议的方法可以保留更多的遗传变异用于关联研究。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 PLoS Clinical Trials
  • 作者

    Jian Wang; Sanjay Shete;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2011(6),11
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 e27642
  • 总页数 13
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号