首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Eumycetozoa = Amoebozoa?: SSUrDNA Phylogeny of Protosteloid Slime Molds and Its Significance for the Amoebozoan Supergroup
【2h】

Eumycetozoa = Amoebozoa?: SSUrDNA Phylogeny of Protosteloid Slime Molds and Its Significance for the Amoebozoan Supergroup

机译:Eumycetozoa = Amoebozoa ?:原生质软泥模的SSUrDNA系统发育及其对变形虫超群的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Amoebae that make fruiting bodies consisting of a stalk and spores and classified as closely related to the myxogastrids have classically been placed in the taxon Eumycetozoa. Traditionally, there are three groups comprising Eumycetozoa: myxogastrids, dictyostelids, and the so-called protostelids. Dictyostelids and myxogastrids both make multicellular fruiting bodies that may contain hundreds of spores. Protostelids are those amoebae that make simple fruiting bodies consisting of a stalk and one or a few spores. Protostelid-like organisms have been suggested as the progenitors of the myxogastrids and dictyostelids, and they have been used to formulate hypotheses on the evolution of fruiting within the group. Molecular phylogenies have been published for both myxogastrids and dictyostelids, but little molecular phylogenetic work has been done on the protostelids. Here we provide phylogenetic trees based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) that include 21 protostelids along with publicly available sequences from a wide variety of amoebae and other eukaryotes. SSU trees recover seven well supported clades that contain protostelids but do not appear to be specifically related to one another and are often interspersed among established groups of amoebae that have never been reported to fruit. In fact, we show that at least two taxa unambiguously belong to amoebozoan lineages where fruiting has never been reported. These analyses indicate that we can reject a monophyletic Eumycetozoa, s.l. For this reason, we will hereafter refer to those slime molds with simple fruiting as protosteloid amoebae and/or protosteloid slime molds, not as protostelids. These results add to our understanding of amoebozoan biodiversity, and demonstrate that the paradigms for understanding both nonfruiting and sporulating amoebae must be integrated. Finally, we suggest strategies for future research on protosteloid amoebae and nonfruiting amoebae, and discuss the impact of this work for taxonomists and phylogenomicists.
机译:传统上,将由茎和孢子组成的子实体的变形虫(Amoebae)置于与粘虫科密切相关的分类虫中。传统上,有三类包括杜仲,即粘虫,双翅目硬壳纲和所谓的原眼界。 Dictyostelids和myxogastrids都可以制造可能包含数百个孢子的多细胞子实体。原产原皮动物是那些形成简单子实体的变形虫,它由茎和一个或几个孢子组成。有人建议将原硬皮动物样生物作为粘虫和双硬皮动物的祖先,并已使用它们来拟定关于该组内果实进化的假说。分子粘虫和双歧硬lid的分子系统发育已被发表,但是对原硬lid的分子系统发育工作很少。在这里,我们提供了基于小亚基核糖体RNA基因(SSU)的系统树,其中包括21个原石lid以及各种变形虫和其他真核生物的公开序列。 SSU树恢复了七个支撑良好的进化枝,这些进化枝含有原石lid,但彼此之间似乎并不特别相关,并且经常散布在成群的变形虫中,但从未报道其结果。实际上,我们证明至少有两个分类单元明确属于从未报道过结果的变形虫家族。这些分析表明,我们可以拒绝单性的真菌门虫,s.l。由于这个原因,我们在下文中将那些具有简单结果的粘液霉菌称为原形生物变形虫和/或类固醇粘液霉菌,而不是原粘菌。这些结果加深了我们对变形虫生物多样性的理解,并表明必须整合理解无结果和孢子形成性变形虫的范例。最后,我们提出了对原生物类变形虫和非结果性变形虫进行进一步研究的策略,并讨论了这项工作对分类学家和系统生物学家的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号