首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oxford Open >2197. Ceftriaxone Monotherapy vs. Ceftriaxone Plus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Non-ICU Patients
【2h】

2197. Ceftriaxone Monotherapy vs. Ceftriaxone Plus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Non-ICU Patients

机译:2197.头孢曲松钠单药疗法与头孢曲松钠加阿奇霉素治疗住院的非ICU患者社区获得性肺炎

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the leading infectious cause of death and severe sepsis in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death overall worldwide. Current United States guidelines for the treatment of CAP recommend empiric antibiotic therapy that covers both standard organisms as well as atypical organisms. Ceftriaxone (CTX) in combination with azithromycin (AZH) is one of the most common regimens used for the treatment of CAP; however, there are studies that show β-lactam monotherapy is as effective as a β-lactam in combination with AZH for the empiric treatment of CAP. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of treatment failure between CTX monotherapy and CTX in combination with AZH in non-intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients.
机译:背景社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是美国主要的传染病死亡和严重败血症,也是全球第五大主要死亡病因。美国现行的CAP治疗指南建议采用经验性抗生素治疗,该治疗应涵盖标准生物和非典型生物。头孢曲松(CTX)与阿奇霉素(AZH)联合使用是治疗CAP的最常见方案之一。然而,有研究表明,β-内酰胺单一疗法与CAP的经验性治疗与AZH联合使用β-内酰胺一样有效。这项研究的目的是比较非重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者中CTX单药治疗和CTX联合AZH的治疗失败率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号