首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Korean Medical Science >Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors Reviewers and Editors
【2h】

Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors Reviewers and Editors

机译:学术期刊论文的相似性和Pla窃性:为作者评论者和编辑者提供清晰的概念

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

What constitutes plagiarism? What are the methods to detect plagiarism? How do “plagiarism detection tools” assist in detecting plagiarism? What is the difference between plagiarism and similarity index? These are probably the most common questions regarding plagiarism that many research experts in scientific writing are usually faced with, but a definitive answer to them is less known to many. According to a report published in 2018, papers retracted for plagiarism have sharply increased over the last two decades, with higher rates in developing and non-English speaking countries. Several studies have reported similar findings with Iran, China, India, Japan, Korea, Italy, Romania, Turkey, and France amongst the countries with highest number of retractions due to plagiarism. , , , A study reported that duplication of text, figures or tables without appropriate referencing accounted for 41.3% of post-2009 retractions of papers published from India. In Pakistan, started a special section titled “Learning Research” and published a couple of papers on research writing skills, research integrity and scientific misconduct. , However, the problem has not been adequately addressed and specific issues about it remain unresolved and unclear. According to an unpublished data based on 1,679 students from four universities of Pakistan, 85.5% did not have a clear understanding of the difference between similarity index and plagiarism (unpublished data). Smart et al. in their global survey of editors reported that around 63% experienced some plagiarized submissions, with Asian editors experiencing the highest levels of plagiarized/duplicated content. In some papers, journals from non-English speaking countries have specifically discussed the cases of plagiarized submissions to them and have highlighted the drawbacks in relying on similarity checking programs. , , The cases of plagiarism in non-English speaking countries have a strong message for honest researchers that they should improve their English writing skills and credit used sources by properly citing and referencing them.
机译:什么是窃?有什么方法可以检测窃? “ pla窃检测工具”如何协助检测窃?窃和相似度指数有什么区别?这些可能是many窃的最常见问题,许多科学写作研究专家通常都会遇到这些窃问题,但许多人对此一无所知。根据2018年发布的一份报告,由于gi窃而撤回的论文在过去的二十年中急剧增加,在发展中国家和非英语国家中,论文的比率更高。几项研究报告了与伊朗,中国,印度,日本,韩国,意大利,罗马尼亚,土耳其和法国相似的发现,这些国家是由于窃而撤回次数最多的国家。一项研究报告称,在没有适当引用的情况下,重复复制文字,图形或表格占印度2009年后撤稿的41.3%。在巴基斯坦,开设了一个名为“学习研究”的特别部分,并发表了有关研究写作技巧,研究完整性和科学不端行为的几篇论文。 ,但是,该问题尚未得到充分解决,有关此问题的特定问题仍未解决和不清楚。根据来自巴基斯坦四所大学的1,679名学生的未公开数据,有85.5%的人对相似性指数和窃之间的区别没有清楚的了解(未公开数据)。 Smart等。在他们对全球编辑的调查中,大约63%的人经历过窃,其中亚洲编辑的content窃/重复内容最高。在一些论文中,来自非英语国家的期刊专门讨论了to窃论文的案例,并强调了依赖相似性检查程序的弊端。 ,,非英语国家的of窃案例向诚实的研究人员发出了强烈的信息,即他们应该通过适当地引用和引用来提高英语写作技能和使用信用来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号