首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of E-test with broth microdilution and disk diffusion for susceptibility testing of coryneform bacteria.
【2h】

Comparison of E-test with broth microdilution and disk diffusion for susceptibility testing of coryneform bacteria.

机译:E检验与肉汤微量稀释和圆盘扩散法对棒状细菌药敏试验的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible. No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.
机译:从临床样本中分离出的135种棒状细菌对氨苄西林(AMP),头孢菌素(CR),头孢西丁(FOX),头孢噻肟(CTX),红霉素(E),环丙沙星(CIP),四环素(TE),丁胺卡那霉素(AK)的敏感性通过圆盘扩散,肉汤微量稀释和E检验确定万古霉素(VA)和利福平(R)。包括以下种类(括号中的分离物数量):解脲棒状杆菌(30),小枝棒状杆菌(20),棒状CDC组ANF-1(20),纹状杆菌(20),耶氏棒杆菌(15),棒状CDC组I2(8),单核细胞增生性李斯特菌(7),干性棒状杆菌(5)和其他棒状细菌(10)。 E检验和肉汤微量稀释在两倍稀释度内的一致性为31%(VA),64%(AK),71%(CTX),77%(FOX和CIP),79%(TE),84%(AMP) ),87%(E)和88%(CR和R)。在1,350种微生物和抗菌剂组合中,发现了85种(6.3%)的解释性差异(轻微的4.2%,严重的1.2%和非常严重的0.9%)。在纸片扩散和E检验之间发现七十(5.1%)的解释类别上的分歧(小比例为3.8%,主要为0.4%,非常重要为0.9%),微量稀释(参考方法)之间有85(6.3%)差异。和磁盘扩散(较小的占4.2%,较大的占0.5%,非常严重的占1.5%)。通过E检验获得的MIC具有很高的重现性。尽管有定量结果,但未观察到VA的类别差异。考虑到解释性类别,此处研究的三种方法之间有很好的总体一致性,但是在考虑棒状细菌和确定抗菌剂定量活性时,需要对药敏试验的当前方法进行进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号