A clinical laboratory evaluation was conducted on the Clinitek Auto 2000, the Super Aution Analyzer and the Urotron RL9 for the determination of glucose, protein, pH, blood, ketone-bodies and bilirubin.Precision of the systems was tested using three commercial control urine materials, and reported as the percentage of times the instrument repeats a certain value. Good repeatability was obtained with all the instruments.Accuracy of the systems was evaluated by comparison with quantitative procedures, and to check agreement between methods yielding semi-quantitative and quantitative results, ranges of acceptability were defined, based on the criteria reported in a previous paper [2]. It was then found that 87.5 to 98.9% of results from the Urotron RL9 and the Clinitek Auto 2000 were acceptable. With the Super Aution Analyzer the level of agreement was apparently lower because of the higher number of concentration steps used by this instrument.
展开▼
机译：在Clinitek Auto 2000，Super Aution分析仪和Urotron RL9上进行了临床实验室评估，以确定葡萄糖，蛋白质，pH，血液，酮体和胆红素的含量，并使用三种市售对照尿液材料测试了系统的精密度。 ，并以仪器重复某个值的次数的百分比报告。所有仪器均具有良好的重复性。通过与定量程序进行比较来评估系统的准确性，并检查产生半定量和定量结果的方法之间的一致性，根据先前论文中报告的标准定义可接受性范围[2]。然后发现，Urotron RL9和Clinitek Auto 2000的结果的87.5％至98.9％是可以接受的。使用超级拍卖分析仪，由于该仪器使用了更多的浓缩步骤，因此协议水平明显降低。
展开▼
