首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Anatomy and Physiology >Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. V. Maxillary postcanine tooth morphology.
【2h】

Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. V. Maxillary postcanine tooth morphology.

机译:上新世-上新世人的牙齿形态分析。 V.上颌后犬牙齿形态。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 139 maxillary molar crowns and 79 maxillary premolar crowns, from at least 98 individual East and Southern African Plio-Pleistocene hominids, has been subjected to detailed morphometric analysis. All but 16 of the 98 specimens were assigned to taxonomic categories identified as EAFROB, EAFHOM, SAFGRA, SAFROB and EAFHER. The analysis was based on whole crowns and the component cusps. While there was variable overlap between the ranges of measured crown base area of the two Southern African taxa, there was little, or no, overlap between the two major East African taxonomic categories. Crown shape distinguished EAFHOM from the three other australopithecine taxa, especially for P3, P4 and M1. Of the non-metrical traits, the expression of Carabelli's complex and the incidence of a distal cuspule discriminate best between the categories. Analysis of the absolute and relative cusp area data shows that the major taxonomic distinction in relative cusp area is in the premolars, in which it is apparent that EAFROB are distinguished by their larger buccal cusps. The principal conclusions of the assessment of the specimens in the 'unknown' category is that the postcanine dentitions of a skull, KNM-ER 1805, and a cranium, KNM-ER 1813, are closest in size and shape to EAFHOM. There is no dental evidence to suggest that these specimens should be assigned to A. africanus, the formal taxon making up the SAFGRA category.
机译:来自至少98个东非和南部非洲上新世原始人的至少139个上颌磨牙冠和79个上颌前磨牙冠已经进行了详细的形态分析。在98个样本中,除16个样本外,所有样本均被分类为EAFROB,EAFHOM,SAFGRA,SAFROB和EAFHER。分析基于整个牙冠和牙尖。尽管在两个南部非洲分类群的被测冠基面积范围之间存在可变的重叠,但是在两个主要的非洲东部生物分类类别之间几乎没有或没有重叠。冠状外形使EAFHOM与其他三个奥古斯汀分类单元区分开,特别是对于P3,P4和M1。在非度量性特征中,Carabelli复合体的表达和远端尖齿的发生率在这两个类别之间有最好的区分。对绝对和相对尖瓣面积数据的分析表明,相对尖瓣面积的主要分类学区别在于前磨牙,其中很明显,EAFROB的特征在于其较大的颊尖。对“未知”类别的标本进行评估的主要结论是,头骨的后齿牙(KNM-ER 1805)和颅骨的后齿牙列(KNM-ER 1813)在尺寸和形状上与EAFHOM最接近。没有牙科证据表明应将这些标本归类为非洲非洲曲霉,这是组成SAFGRA类别的正式分类单元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号