首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Journal of Psychiatry >Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
【2h】

Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies

机译:广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑中的情绪调节:研究情绪调节策略的不同和共同使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: According to the transdiagnostic view, emotion regulation strategies are common among emotional disorders. Despite the vast majority of studies demonstrating the common role of emotion regulation strategies in emotional disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD), distinct functions of these strategies are largely unknown. So, the aim of the present study was to assess the distinct and shared use of emotion regulation strategies in individuals with GAD and SAD symptoms. Method : Participants were recruited from a community sample of Tehran using purposive sampling method. The sample (N = 346) consisted of 269 nonclinical individuals, 47 individuals with generalized anxiety symptoms, and 30 individuals with social anxiety symptoms. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and they were asked to fill in a series of self -report questionnaires including GAD-IV, SIAS, DERS, EQ, ACS, and RRS. Data were analyzed by discriminant function analysis using SPSS-23. Results: Findings revealed significant differences between the 3 groups in non-acceptance, focusing, shifting, brooding, and decentering (P<0.01). Results of discriminant function analysis showed 2 functions: the first accounted for 87.4% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.81, df = 10, P<0.01, χ2 = 70.06), and the second for 12.6% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.97, df = 4, P<0.05, χ2 = 9.43) of between group variability. Non-acceptance and focusing discriminated GAD and SAD the most. Conclusion: The findings of the present study support both splitter and lumper approaches as there were some emotion regulation strategies common between GAD and SAD, including shifting, decentering, and brooding. However, some of them were distinct, such as focusing and non-acceptance. Nevertheless, there are still inconsistencies in research about the findings, and thus examining the pathways may illuminate these findings.
机译:目的:根据经转诊的观点,情绪调节策略在情绪障碍中很常见。尽管绝大多数研究表明情绪调节策略在包括广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和社交焦虑症(SAD)在内的情绪障碍中具有共同作用,但这些策略的独特功能在很大程度上尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是评估在具有GAD和SAD症状的个体中情绪调节策略的独特和共享使用。 方法 使用目的抽样方法从德黑兰的社区样本中招募了参与者。样本(N = 346)由269位非临床个体,47位具有广泛性焦虑症状的个体和30位具有社交焦虑症状的个体组成。获得所有参与者的知情同意,并要求他们填写一系列自我报告调查表,包括GAD-IV,SIAS,DERS,EQ,ACS和RRS。使用SPSS-23通过判别函数分析来分析数据。 结果:研究结果表明,三组在不接受,聚焦,移动,沉思和偏心方面存在显着差异(P <0.01)。判别函数分析的结果显示有2个函数:第一个占方差的87.4%(Wilk的Lambda = 0.81,df = 10,P <0.01,χ2= 70.06),第二个占方差的12.6%(Wilk)组间变异性的s Lambda = 0.97,df = 4,P <0.05,χ2= 9.43)。不接受和专注是GAD和SAD的最大区别。 结论:由于GAD和SAD之间存在一些共同的情绪调节策略,包括移位,偏心和沉思,因此本研究的结果支持分离方法和整块方法。但是,其中一些是截然不同的,例如专注和不接受。然而,关于发现的研究仍存在不一致之处,因此检查这些途径可能可以阐明这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号