首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >Toward a Constructivist Model of Radicalization and Deradicalization: A Conceptual and Methodological Proposal
【2h】

Toward a Constructivist Model of Radicalization and Deradicalization: A Conceptual and Methodological Proposal

机译:建立激进主义和反激进主义的建构主义模型:一个概念和方法上的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article identifies common features of existing models of radicalization and deradicalization, such as the transition from uncertainty to certainty, before integrating these in a model based upon personal construct theory. It is proposed that the personal construct concepts of validation and invalidation are particularly relevant to processes of identity change such as radicalization and deradicalization. Thus, it is argued that radicalization occurs when major invalidation of an individual’s construing is followed by the development of a new radicalized view of the world that provides a turning point in his or her sense of identity and a more structured and certain view of the world. There is likely to be seeking out of validation for this view in interactions with others who share similar views or by extorting evidence for the individual’s radical constructions. These constructions are likely to involve extreme negative views of another group, by contrast to members of which, and possibly by taking extreme action against this group, the individual’s new self-construction may become further defined. These same processes can be seen to operate in deradicalization, and it will therefore be argued that the model has implications for the development of deradicalization programs. A further advantage of the model is that it has an associated personal construct methodology, particularly repertory grid technique, that may be used to investigate processes of radicalization and deradicalization. As illustrations of such investigations, results will be summarized from a repertory grid study of Salafist Muslims in Tunisia, some of whom had returned from fighting in Syria, and an analysis of the writings of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik. The findings of these investigations are argued to be consistent with the personal construct model of radicalization and deradicalization.
机译:本文确定了激进和激进主义现有模型的共同特征,例如从不确定性到确定性的转变,然后将这些特征整合到基于个人建构理论的模型中。有人提出,确认和无效的个人构想与身份改​​变的过程特别相关,例如激进化和反激化。因此,有人认为,当一个人的构想严重无效之后,发展出一种新的激进的世界观,这为他或她的认同感以及更结构化和确定性的世界观提供了转折点,就发生了激进化。 。与具有相似观点的其他人进行互动,或为个人的根本构想索取证据,可能会寻求对该观点的验证。与其他成员相比,这些建构可能会牵涉到另一个群体的极端消极看法,并可能通过对该群体采取极端行动,来进一步定义个人的新自我建构。可以看到这些相同的过程在反激基化中起作用,因此,有人认为该模型对反激基化程序的开发有影响。该模型的另一个优点是它具有关联的个人构造方法,特别是库网格技术,可用于研究激进和自由基的过程。作为此类调查的例证,结果将来自对突尼斯萨拉菲穆斯林的全部汇编网格研究(其中一些人是从叙利亚战斗中返回的)以及对挪威大规模杀人犯安德斯·布雷维克著作的分析得出的总结。这些调查的结果被认为与激进和激进的个人建构模型是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号