首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Welfare State Regimes Gender and Depression: A Multilevel Analysis of Middle and High Income Countries
【2h】

Welfare State Regimes Gender and Depression: A Multilevel Analysis of Middle and High Income Countries

机译:福利国家制度性别与抑郁:中高收入国家的多层次分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using the 2002 World Health Survey, we examine the association between welfare state regimes, gender and mental health among 26 countries classified into seven distinct regimes: Conservative, Southeast Asian, Eastern European, Latin American, Liberal, Southern/Ex-dictatorship, and Social Democratic. A two-level hierarchical model found that the odds of experiencing a brief depressive episode in the last 12 months was significantly higher for Southern/Ex- dictatorship countries than for Southeast Asian (odds ratio (OR) = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.27) and Eastern European (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.22–0.58) regimes after controlling for gender, age, education, marital status, and economic development. In adjusted interaction models, compared to Southern/Ex-dictatorship males (reference category), the odds ratios of depression were significantly lower among Southeast Asian males (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.34) and females (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.10–0.53) and Eastern European males (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.63) and significantly higher among females in Liberal (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.14–3.49) and Southern (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.86–3.15) regimes. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating middle-income countries into comparative welfare regime research and testing for interactions between welfare regimes and gender on mental health.
机译:使用2002年世界卫生调查,我们考察了26个国家中福利国家制度,性别和精神健康之间的关联,这些国家分为七个不同的制度:保守,东南亚,东欧,拉丁美洲,自由,南方/独裁和社会民主的。两级分层模型发现,在过去的12个月中,南部/独裁国家经历短暂的抑郁发作的几率明显高于东南亚国家(优势比(OR)= 0.12,95%置信区间(CI) )(0.05-0.27)和东欧(OR = 0.36,95%CI 0.22-0.58)制度控制了性别,年龄,教育,婚姻状况和经济发展之后。在调整后的互动模型中,与南方/独裁男性(参考类别)相比,东南亚男性(OR = 0.16,95%CI 0.08-0.34)和女性(OR = 0.23,95)的抑郁几率显着降低CI的百分比为0.10–0.53)和东欧的男性(OR = 0.41,95%的CI为0.26–0.63),而自由党的女性(OR = 2.00,95%的CI为1.14–3.49)和南部地区的女性更高(OR = 2.42,95%) CI 1.86–3.15)制度。我们的结果强调了将中等收入国家纳入比较福利制度研究和测试福利制度与性别在心理健康方面的相互作用的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号