首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Hypertension >Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of Laboratory and Clinical Findings according to the New ISHHP Criteria
【2h】

Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of Laboratory and Clinical Findings according to the New ISHHP Criteria

机译:早发型和晚发型先兆子痫:根据新的ISHHP标准对实验室和临床发现进行的综合队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, the diagnostic criteria of preeclampsia have been changed. No studies are available in the literature that analyzed in detail the differences between early-onset preeclampsia (EOP) and late-onset preeclampsia (LOP), taking into account the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) criteria. Thus, we sought to retrospectively investigate in detail the differences in clinical and laboratory outcomes between EOP and LOP diagnosed according to the ISSHP criteria. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 214 women with singleton pregnancies and preeclampsia admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology of the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland, from 2013 to 2017 (113 (52.8%) women with EOP and 101 (47.2%) women with LOP). Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics and medical history, laboratory tests, and delivery and neonatal data. Patients with preeclampsia accounted for 1.7% of the women who delivered during the study period. The EOP and LOP groups did not differ in the distribution of risk factors for preeclampsia. The most common risk factor was primiparity, which was observed in 72.0% of cases. Regarding the ISSHP diagnostic criteria, the two groups differed in the incidence of fetal growth restriction (p=0.0009), hemolysis (p=0.0416), and neurological complications (p=00342), which were found more often in the EOP group. In addition, the EOP group had more frequent occurrence of severe cardiorespiratory (p < 0.0001) and hematological (p=0.0127) complications, adverse fetoplacental conditions (p < 0.0001), and severe fetoplacental complications (p=0.0003). Children born to women with EOP had lower Apgar scores (p < 0.001) and higher rates of intraventricular hemorrhage (p < 0.0001), respiratory disorders requiring mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), and early (p=0.0004) and late sepsis (p=0.002). EOP differed from LOP in terms of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. The observed higher rates of fetoplacental adverse conditions and severe complications indicate a significant contribution of impaired placentation to the etiopathogenesis of EOP.
机译:最近,先兆子痫的诊断标准已经改变。考虑到国际妊娠高血压研究协会(ISSHP)的标准,目前尚无文献能够详细分析早发型先兆子痫(EOP)和晚发型先兆子痫(LOP)之间的差异。因此,我们试图回顾性详细研究根据ISSHP标准诊断出的EOP和LOP之间在临床和实验室结果方面的差异。回顾性队列研究于2013年至2017年在波兰克拉科夫大学医院的妇产科和妇产科就诊的214名单胎妊娠和先兆子痫妇女中(113名(52.8%)患有EOP的妇女和101名(47.2%))有LOP的女性)。审查了电子病历,以了解人口统计和病史,实验室检查以及分娩和新生儿数据。子痫前期患者占研究期间分娩妇女的1.7%。 EOP和LOP组在先兆子痫的危险因素分布上没有差异。最常见的危险因素是初产,在72.0%的病例中观察到。关于ISSHP诊断标准,两组在胎儿生长受限(p = 0.0009),溶血(p = 0.0416)和神经系统并发症(p = 00342)的发生率上有所不同,这在EOP组中更为常见。此外,EOP组发生严重的心肺呼吸(p <0.0001)和血液学(p = 0.0127)并发症,不利的胎盘胎盘疾病(p <0.0001)和严重的胎盘胎盘并发症(p = 0.0003)的发生率更高。患有EOP的女性所生的孩子的Apgar评分较低(p <0.001),脑室内出血发生率较高(p <0.0001),需要机械通气的呼吸系统疾病(p <0.0001),早期(p = 0.0004)和败血症晚期(p = 0.002)。在产妇和围产期不良结局方面,EOP与LOP不同。观察到的较高的胎盘胎盘不良状况和严重并发症的发生率表明胎盘受损对EOP病因的重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号