首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome
【2h】

Impact of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio Z score on fetal growth and the perinatal outcome

机译:胎盘重量和胎儿/胎盘重量比Z分数对胎儿生长和围产期结局的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To classify the infants into 9 blocks based on the deviation of both placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z score and compared the incident rate of perinatal death in each of the small for date (SFD) vs. appropriate for date (AFD) vs. heavy for date (HFD) groups.>Methods: The study population consisted of 93,034 placentas/infants from women who vaginally delivered a singleton infant. They were classified into 3 groups according to infants' weight: SFD (n=3,379), AFD (n=81,143) and HFD (n=8,512). The population was classified into 9 blocks according to the combination of i) low vs. middle vs. high placental weight (PW: a sex-, parity- and gestational-age-specific placental weight) and ii) low vs. middle vs. high F/P. In both i) and ii), ± 1.28 standard deviations in the in the Z scores was used for classifying low vs. middle vs. high, with 3x3 making 9 blocks. We then determined whether or not the perinatal death in each block differed among the three groups (SFD vs. AFD vs. HFD).>Results: (1) The proportions of 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' (appropriate PW and F/P based on Z-score) were 37.6% in the SFD group, 78.8% in the AFD group, and 51.2% in HFD group. (2) The proportion of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' in the SFD group and that of 'inappropriately light placenta' in the HFD group were 0.3 and 0.4%, respectively, a very rare phenomenon. The proportions of 'inappropriately heavy placenta' and 'inappropriately light placenta' accounted for 4.1 and 5.5% in AFD group, respectively. (3) The rates of perinatal death in those with 'balanced growth of placenta and infant' were lowest in the SFD and AFD groups.>Conclusion: By showing the fact that perinatal death was lowest in cases with balanced fetal/ placental growth, we conclude that 9-block categorization of PW and F/P based on deviation in the Z-score may be a candidate factor employable for understanding fetal and placental growth and perinatal deaths.
机译:>目的:根据胎盘重量(PW)和胎儿/胎盘重量比(F / P)Z得分的偏差将婴儿分为9个区块,并比较每个婴儿的围产期死亡发生率>方法:研究人群包括93,034名来自阴道分娩的妇女的胎盘素/婴儿,其中,日期较小的(SFD)相对于适宜的日期(AFD)相对于较重的日期(HFD)组而言。单身婴儿。根据婴儿的体重将其分为3组:SFD(n = 3,379),AFD(n = 81,143)和HFD(n = 8,512)。根据i)低胎盘体重与中胎盘体重与高胎盘体重(PW:性别,胎龄和胎龄的特定胎盘重量)和ii)低胎盘体重与中胎盘体重与高胎盘体重的组合,将人群分为9个区块。高F / P。在i)和ii)中,Z得分的±1.28标准偏差用于对低级,中级和高级进行分类,其中3x3分为9个块。然后,我们确定三组中每个区块的围产期死亡是否不同(SFD,AFD和HFD)。>结果:(1)“胎盘和婴儿均衡生长”的比例(基于Z评分的适当PW和F / P)在SFD组中为37.6%,在AFD组中为78.8%,在HFD组中为51.2%。 (2)SFD组中“胎盘不适当重”的比例和HFD组中“胎盘不重”的比例分别为0.3%和0.4%,这是非常罕见的现象。 AFD组中“不适当的重胎盘”和“不适当的轻胎盘”分别占4.1%和5.5%。 (3)在SFD和AFD组中,“胎盘和婴儿均衡生长”组的围产期死亡率最低。>结论:通过显示事实,即平衡型胎盘组的围产期死亡率最低。胎儿/胎盘生长,我们得出结论,基于Z值偏差的PW和F / P的9块分类可能是可用于了解胎儿和胎盘生长以及围产期死亡的候选因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号