首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance in sealing the surgical wound lips
【2h】

An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance in sealing the surgical wound lips

机译:一种评估缝合口密封性的缝合线顺应性的创新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and aim: The increasing number of surgical procedures performed with local anesthesia, followed by immediate patient discharge from the hospital, emphasizes the need for a tight waterproof suture that is capable of maintaining its tensile strength in the postoperative phase when the wound tumescence, edema due to the anesthetic drug, and surgical trauma disappear. Moreover, the issue of having an accurate surgical wound closure is very relevant in vivo in order to prevent hemorrhage and exogenous microbial infections. This study aimed at designing a new a lab technique that could be used for evaluating the best surgical material. Using such a technique, we compared the wound-lip-sealing properties of three commonly-used suture threads, namely polyurethane, polypropylene, and polyamide.>Materials and methods: The mechanical properties of same-size suture threads made from polyurethane, polypropylene, and polyamide, were compared in order to define the one that possess the best elastic properties by being able to counteract the tension-relaxation process in the first 12 hours following surgery. The tension holding capacity of the suture materials was measured in both in vivo and in vitro experiments. The surface area of the scar associated with the three different suture threads was measured and compared, and the permeability of the three different suture threads was assessed at 0 minute, 2 minute, 4 minute, 6 minute, and 8 minute- interval.>Results: Results showed that polyurethane suture threads had significantly (P < 0.05) better tensile strength, elongation endurance before breakage, and better elasticity coefficient as compared to polypropylene and polyamide suture threads. Moreover, polyurethane suture threads were significantly (P < 0.05) more impermeable as compared to the other two suture thread types (polypropylene and polyamide). This impermeability was also associated with a tighter wound-lip-sealing ability, and with significantly (P < 0.05) less scar formation.>Conclusion: Among the main concerns that surgeons, physicians, and patients often have is the development infection, oozing, and scar at the incision site following suturing. This always raises the question about which suture to use to avoid the above problems. This study provides evidence that the new technique developed in our lab could be used to compare the wound-lip sealing properties of different surgical suture threads. Using such a technique, the results show that polyurethane is significantly better than other commonly-used suture threads, like polypropylene and polyamide, in relation to wound sealing and scar formation.
机译:>背景和目标:越来越多的采用局部麻醉的外科手术程序,随后患者立即从医院出院,强调需要紧密的防水缝合线,该缝合线应能在术后保持其拉伸强度伤口肿胀时阶段,由于麻醉药物引起的水肿,以及手术创伤消失。而且,为了防止出血和外源性微生物感染,在体内具有精确的手术伤口闭合的问题非常重要。这项研究旨在设计一种新的实验室技术,可用于评估最佳手术材料。使用这种技术,我们比较了三种常用缝合线(聚氨酯,聚丙烯和聚酰胺)的伤口口密封性能。>材料和方法:相同尺寸的缝合线的机械性能比较了由聚氨酯,聚丙烯和聚酰胺制成的材料,以定义一种具有最佳弹性的材料,因为它能够抵消术后头12小时的松弛松弛过程。在体内和体外实验中都测量了缝合线材料的张力保持能力。测量和比较与三种不同的缝合线相关的疤痕的表面积,并以0分钟,2分钟,4分钟,6分钟和8分钟的间隔评估三种不同的缝合线的渗透性。 >结果:结果显示,与聚丙烯和聚酰胺缝合线相比,聚氨酯缝合线的抗张强度,断裂前的伸长率和弹性系数均显着(P <0.05)。而且,与其他两种缝合线类型(聚丙烯和聚酰胺)相比,聚氨酯缝合线的不渗透性显着(P <0.05)。这种不渗透性还与更紧密的伤口唇密封能力有关,并且与疤痕形成明显减少(P <0.05)。>结论:外科医生,医生和患者经常关注的主要问题是缝合后在切口部位出现发育感染,渗血和疤痕。这总是引起关于使用哪种缝合线来避免上述问题的问题。这项研究提供了证据,证明我们实验室开发的新技术可用于比较不同手术缝合线的伤口唇密封性能。使用这种技术,结果表明,在伤口密封和疤痕形成方面,聚氨酯明显优于其他常用的缝合线,例如聚丙烯和聚酰胺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号