首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Advances in Medical Education Professionalism >Grasha-Richmann college students’ learning styles of classroom participation: role of gender and major
【2h】

Grasha-Richmann college students’ learning styles of classroom participation: role of gender and major

机译:Grasha-Richmann大学生的课堂参与学习方式:性别和专业的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the male and female students’ learning styles of classroom participation and these styles’ differences between Humanities and Science majors. >Method: 1039 individuals were selected through the proportional stratified random sampling method among undergraduate and graduate students in Humanities (n=421) and Science (n=618) faculties of Tehran University. In the Humanities group, there were 285 females and 136 males, and in the Science group, there were 208 females and 410 males. The participants answered the Grasha-Riechmann student learning styles scale. >Results: The findings indicated that the females obtained significantly higher means in collaborative, participative, and dependent styles than males, but in avoidant, and independent styles, the means for males were higher than those for females. Also, the science group’s means in collaborative, participative, dependent, and competitive styles were significantly higher than those for the humanities group. >Conclusion: According to the findings, it seems that due to psychological characteristics, female students tend to collaborate with other students of the same sex and participate in their activities. In this way, they also are more dependent on their teacher and classroom, because otherwise they will face some problems such as anxiety. In addition, it seems that science students in comparison to humanities students are more participative and collaborative because they need more collaboration in their projects and course work.
机译:>简介:该研究旨在调查男女学生课堂参与的学习方式以及这些方式在人文与理科专业之间的差异。 >方法:通过比例分层随机抽样方法从德黑兰大学的人文(n = 421)和理科(n = 618)的本科生和研究生中选择了1039个人。在人文学科组中,有285名女性和136名男性,在科学组中,有208名女性和410名男性。参与者回答了Grasha-Riechmann学生的学习风格量表。 >结果:研究结果表明,女性在协作,参与和抚养风格上的平均得分高于男性,但在回避和独立的风格中,男性的平均得分高于女性。此外,科学组在协作,参与,依赖和竞争方式方面的手段明显高于人文学科。 >结论:根据调查结果,似乎由于心理特征,女学生倾向于与其他同性学生合作并参与其活动。这样,他们也更依赖于老师和教室,因为否则他们将面临诸如焦虑之类的问题。此外,与人文学科学生相比,理科学生似乎更具参与性和协作性,因为他们在项目和课程工作中需要更多的协作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号