首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics >Gender Selection: Ethical Scientific Legal and Practical Issues
【2h】

Gender Selection: Ethical Scientific Legal and Practical Issues

机译:性别选择:伦理科学法律和实践问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: This work offers an overview of the technology available and assisted reproductive technology (ART) practitioner attitudes to human reproductive sex preselection in either sperm with the use of flow cytometry (FC) or in embryos by means of preimplantational genetic diagnose (PGD) together with an analysis of Spanish legal environment.>Methods: A review of the legal, ethical and technical literature of the methods to select the sex in the offspring is performed.>Results: Sex selection in humans has different utilities to be employed depending on each country's law. Moreover, different ethical concerns are raised depending on the type of sex selection, in sperm or embryos. Both methodologies to pre-select the sex are trustworthy, with a high predictive power in the determination of the sex, but nevertheless, PGD is better than FC selection in this aspect.>Conclusions: After a careful analysis of ethical, legal, and scientific features of gender selection, FC combined with PGD appears to be the most acceptable way to select the sex of the progeny whatever the circumstances are.
机译:>目的:这项工作概述了可利用的技术以及辅助生殖技术(ART)执业者对使用流式细胞仪(FC)或通过流式细胞术在胚胎中进行人类生殖性预选的态度。植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)以及西班牙法律环境的分析。>方法:对选择后代性别的方法的法律,道德和技术文献进行了回顾。>结果:根据每个国家/地区的法律,人类的性别选择具有不同的用途。而且,根据性别选择的类型,在精子或胚胎中引起了不同的伦理关注。两种预先选择性别的方法都是值得信赖的,在确定性别方面具有很高的预测能力,但是在这方面,PGD优于FC选择。>结论:在性别选择的道德,法律和科学特征方面,FC与PGD结合使用似乎是在任何情况下选择后代性别的最可接受的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号