首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows
【2h】

Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows

机译:估算非泌乳牛肠甲烷和二氧化碳排放量的三种方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Among techniques for estimating enteric methane (CH4) emission by ruminants, open-circuit respiration chambers (>OC), the use of a gas tracer (SF6), and the GreenFeed (>GF) device are the most commonly used. In this study, we compared these techniques in 8 dry cows receiving a diet made of 70% hay and 30% concentrates given in limited and constant amounts, in a 15-wk experiment. Two periods in free stalls for SF6 and GF and in chambers for OC were used; in addition, SF6 was determined in chambers for 1 period. Methane emission (g/d) and CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) were higher (P < 0.0001) for OC than for SF6 and GF (367, 310, and 319 g/d for OC, SF6, and GF, respectively). The difference between OC and GF was related to a difference in post-prandial rate of gas emission. The between-animal coefficient of variation of CH4 emission was higher for SF6 than for OC and GF (20.8, 13.5, and 12.0% on average, respectively). Correlation coefficients between OC and SF6 were high and significant for CH4 emission and CH4 yield (r = 0.782 and r = 0.717, respectively; P < 0.05), but not significant between OC and GF, or between SF6 and GF. Correlation coefficients were highly significant for SF6 determined either in free stalls or in chambers (r = 0.908 and 0.903 for CH4 in g/d and g/kg DMI, respectively; P < 0.01). Carbon dioxide (CO2) emission and CO2 yield were similar for GF and OC (10,003 and 9,887 g/d, 752 and 746 g/kg DMI, respectively); CO2 data obtained with SF6 were lower (7,718 g/d and 606 g/kg DMI; P < 0.0001), but this technique is not relevant for CO2 emission determination. Correlation coefficients between OC and GF were not significant for CO2 emission and CO2 yield. This set of results shows that differences between methods are minor for average values, but that individual correlations may limit their interchangeability for determining gas emissions of individual animals. This study also shows the reliability of GF on-farm determination of CH4 and CO2 emissions for groups of animals.
机译:反刍动物,开式呼吸室(> OC ),气体示踪剂(SF6)和GreenFeed(> GF )设备是最常用的。在这项研究中,我们在一个15周的实验中,比较了8种干奶牛的这些技术,这些干奶牛以有限和恒定的量饲喂70%的干草和30%的浓缩饲料。 SF6和GF的免费摊位和OC的密闭室使用了两个时段。另外,在小室中测定SF6 1次。 OC的甲烷排放量(g / d)和CH4的产量(g / kg DMI)比SF6和GF高(P <0.0001)(OC,SF6和GF分别为367、310和319 g / d) 。 OC和GF之间的差异与餐后气体排放速率的差异有关。 SF6的CH4排放的动物间变化系数高于OC和GF(平均分别为20.8%,13.5%和12.0%)。 OC和SF6之间的相关系数很高,并且对于CH4排放和CH4产量具有显着相关性(r分别为0.782和r = 0.717; P <0.05),但在OC和GF之间,或SF6和GF之间不显着。在自由隔间或室内确定的SF6的相关系数非常显着(CH4的g / d和g / kg DMI分别为r = 0.908和0.903; P <0.01)。 GF和OC的二氧化碳(CO2)排放量和CO 2 产量相似(分别为10,003和9,887 g / d,752和746 g / kg DMI);用SF 6 获得的CO 2 数据较低(分别为7,718 g / d和606 g / kg DMI; P <0.0001),但该技术与CO 6不相关> 2 排放确定。 OC和GF之间的相关系数对于CO 2 的排放和CO 2 的产量无显着影响。这组结果表明,方法之间的平均值平均值差异很小,但是各个相关性可能会限制它们在确定单个动物的气体排放量方面的互换性。这项研究还表明,GF在农场中测定动物群中CH 4 和CO 2 排放的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号