首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Development of a Fitness Test Battery for Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Operators—A Pilot Study
【2h】

Development of a Fitness Test Battery for Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Operators—A Pilot Study

机译:开发适用于特殊武器和策略(SWAT)运营商的健身测试电池 - 试点研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This investigation examined relationships between a Special Weapons and Tactics-specific fitness test (SORT) and an obstacle course (OC) used for qualification in fourteen male SWAT members from three local, regional police departments. The SORT included: squat, pushup, and lunge in 60 s; pullup hold; sled drag; and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test L1. The obstacle course included: 25 m sprint (repeated); window ascent; scale under a wall; 25 m serpentine run (repeated), body drag (20 m, repeated). Pearson coefficients examined SORT and OC relationships (p ≤ 0.05); intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) assessed agreement of SORT trials. Repeated measures ANOVA evaluated differences in SORT metrics across time. Coefficients of variation (COV) examined SORT scoring consistency. The YoYo test was related to all SORT assessments (r = −0.803–0.894), except sled drag. The remaining SORT metrics were related to ≥two tests. SORT COVs ranged from 0.77–13.26% for trials 1–2 but decreased between trials 2–3 (0.95–8.97%). The OC was associated with YoYo, lunges, squats and sled drag (r = −0.790, −0.730, −0.766, and 0.802, respectively). No differences (p > 0.05) existed across SORT trials for event scores. The SORT battery appears to be a valid and reliable testing measure to assess SWAT occupational specific fitness.
机译:这项调查审查了特殊武器和策略特定健身试验(Sort)和障碍课程(OC)的关系,用于来自三个当地区域警察部门的十四名男性SWAT成员资格。这些类型包括:60秒的蹲下,俯卧撑和弓步;上拉;雪橇;和yo-yo间歇性恢复测试L1。包括:25米冲刺(重复)25米;窗户上升;墙下的尺度; 25米蛇形运行(重复),体拖(重复20米)。 Pearson系数检查排序和OC关系(p≤0.05);腹部相关系数(ICC2,1)评估了分类试验的协议。反复测量ANOVA评估跨时间的排序度量的差异。变异系数(COV)检查分类评分一致性。 yoyo测试与所有排序评估有关(r = -0.803-0.894),除了吊带拖动。剩余的排序度量与≥TTWO测试有关。对试验1-2的试验仅为0.77-13.26%,但试验2-3之间减少(0.95-8.97%)。该OC与yoyo,肺,蹲和滑动拖拉(r = -0.790,-0.730,-0.766和0.802)相关联。对于事件分数的排序试验,在排序试验中没有差异(p> 0.05)。分类电池似乎是评估SWAT职业特定健身的有效且可靠的测试措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号