首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Development Reproduction >A Normative Review on Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD):Focusing on the German Discussion on PrenaTest®
【2h】

A Normative Review on Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD):Focusing on the German Discussion on PrenaTest®

机译:非侵入性产前诊断(NIPD)的规范性综述:专注于对Prenatest®的德语讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article aims to introduce German discussion on the approval of thenon-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), which started with the development ofPrenaTest® by LifeCodexx AG. The discussion started withthe concern that the non-invasive nature of NIPD, such asPrenaTest®, may rapidly expand the use and scope ofsimilar tests, thus leading to a new era of eugenics. Based on this concern, theneed for clear clinical guidelines on specific indications for NIPD has beensuggested. Along the same line, it was discussed whetherPrenaTest® is against the Basic Law prohibitingdiscrimination on grounds of disability and whether the test is outside thescope of the purpose of gene testing limited by Genetic Diagnosis Act. Throughsuch discussion, the Federal Ministry of Health of Germany established thepreconditions for inclusion of NIPD in the German public health insurancesystem. For this, the German motherhood guideline was amended and theinformation for the insured persons provided to pregnant women was included inthe amended guideline. Such discussion made in Germany provides insight on whichpoints should be considered when various gene testings are accepted in Korea ,in which genetic communication has not been systematized yet. In particular,German counseling system for pregnant women will provide valuable insights forKorea where the direction for regulations on abortion has not been establishedeven after the ruling by the Constitutional Court that charges for abortion areagainst the constitution.
机译:本文旨在就批准介绍德国讨论非侵入性产前诊断(NIPD),开始发展prenatest®by lifecodexx ag。讨论开始了关切的是nipd的非侵入性质,如prenatest®可能会迅速扩大使用和范围类似的测试,从而导致一个新的珍珠学时代。基于这一问题,需要对NIPD的具体适应症进行明确的临床指南建议。沿着同一条线,讨论了是否prenatest®是针对禁止的基本法对残疾理由的歧视以及测试是否在外面基因检测目的范围受到遗传诊断法的限制。通过这种讨论,联邦卫生部德国卫生部成立了在德国公共卫生保险中包含NIPD的前提条件系统。为此,德国母性指南修订了提供给孕妇的被保险人的信息包括在内修订的准则。在德国制造的这种讨论提供了洞察力当韩国接受各种基因测试时,应考虑积分,其中遗传交流尚未氧化。特别是,孕妇德国辅导系统将为韩国尚未建立堕胎法规的方向即使由宪法法院裁决,堕胎的收费也是如此反对宪法。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 Development Reproduction
  • 作者

    Na-Kyoung Kim;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2021(25),2
  • 年度 2021
  • 页码 113–121
  • 总页数 10
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    机译:prenatest;无侵袭性产前诊断;基因测试;生物伦理;遗传交流;堕胎;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号