首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease >Antimicrobial stewardship programs; a two-part narrative review ofstep-wise design and issues of controversy Part I: step-wise design of anantimicrobial stewardship program
【2h】

Antimicrobial stewardship programs; a two-part narrative review ofstep-wise design and issues of controversy Part I: step-wise design of anantimicrobial stewardship program

机译:抗微生物管道计划;两部分叙述审查逐步设计和争议问题的问题I:迈出的设计抗微生物管道计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regardless of one’s opinion of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), it ishardly possible to work in hospital care and not be exposed to the term or itspractical effects. Despite the term being relatively new, the number ofpublications in the field is vast, including several excellent reviews ofgeneral and specific aspects. Work in antimicrobial stewardship is complex, andincludes not only aspects of infectious disease and microbiology, but also ofepidemiology, genetics, behavioural psychology, systems science, economics andethics, to name a few. This review aims to take several of these aspects and thescientific evidence of antimicrobial stewardship studies and merge them into twoquestions: How should we design ASPs based on what we know today? And which arethe most essential unanswered questions regarding antimicrobial stewardship on abroader scale?
机译:无论抗微生物管理计划(ASPS)的意见,它是几乎不能在医院照顾中工作,而不是暴露于术语或其实际效果。尽管术语相对较新,但数量该领域的出版物是巨大的,包括几个优秀的评论一般和具体方面。在抗微生物管道工作是复杂的,而且不仅包括传染病和微生物学的方面,还包括流行病学,遗传学,行为心理学,系统科学,经济学和道德,命名几个。这篇审查旨在采取这些方面的几个方面抗微生物管家学习的科学证据并将它们合并成两个问题:我们应该如何根据我们今天所知的基础设计ASP?那是关于抗微生物管理的最重要的未答复问题更广泛的规模?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号