首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >Effect of feeding barley or corn silage with dry-rolled barley corn or a blend of barley and corn grain on rumen fermentation total tract digestibility and nitrogen balance for finishing beef heifers
【2h】

Effect of feeding barley or corn silage with dry-rolled barley corn or a blend of barley and corn grain on rumen fermentation total tract digestibility and nitrogen balance for finishing beef heifers

机译:喂养大麦或玉米青贮玉米或玉米谷物混合物喂养大麦或玉米青贮瘤胃发酵总散热能力和整理牛仔饲料的氮气平衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Five ruminally cannulated heifers were used in an incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design to determine the effects of cereal silage (barley vs. corn), cereal grain (barley vs. corn vs. a 50:50 blend of barley and corn), and their interaction (S × G) on dry matter intake, ruminal fermentation, total tract digestibility, nitrogen balance, and in situ degradation. Corn silage (CS) or barley silage (BS) was included at 8% of dietary dry matter (DM). Within each silage source, diets contained (DM basis) either dry-rolled barley (BG; 86%), dry-rolled corn (CG; 85%), or an equal blend of barley and corn (BLEND; 85%). Periods were 25 d, with 5 d of dietary transition, 13 d of dietary adaptation, and 7 d of data and sample collection. Samples collected included feed and refusals, total urine and feces, and ruminal fluid. All data were analyzed using the Mixed model of SAS with the fixed effects of silage, grain, and the S × G. Dry matter intake (P ≥ 0.19) and mean ruminal pH (P ≥ 0.096) were not affected by the silage, grain, or S × G. Total short-chain fatty acid concentrations were greater for BLEND than BG or CG (grain, P = 0.003) and for CS (silage, P = 0.009) relative to BS. The molar proportion of acetate was greater for BS-BG and BS-CG (S × G, P < 0.001), while molar proportion of propionate was greater for CS-BG (S × G, P < 0.001) relative to other silage and grain source combinations. Rumen ammonia-N concentration was greater for CG than BG, or BLEND (grain, P < 0.001), and greater for CS compared to BS (silage, P = 0.023). Apparent total tract digestibility of DM, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, starch, and gross energy were greatest for BG (grain, P ≤ 0.035). Digestible energy content (Mcal/kg) was greater for BG (grain, P = 0.029) than CG and BLEND. Total nitrogen retention (g/d and % of intake) was greatest for CS-BG (S × G, P ≤ 0.033) relative to all other treatments. In situ degradation rates of DM, crude protein, and starch were greater for BG than CG (P ≤ 0.004). The potentially degradable fraction of DM, crude protein, and starch was greater for CG (P ≤ 0.031), while the undegradable fraction was greater for BG (P ≤ 0.046). For silage sources, CS had greater 24 h in situ DM digestibility (P = 0.009) and starch digestibility (24, 48, and 72 h incubations, P ≤ 0.034) relative to BS. Results suggest that while feeding a combination of CS and BG promotes propionate production and greater N retention; few other additive effects were observed.
机译:在一个不完整的6×6拉丁方形设计中使用了五个仪式插管的小型母舰,以确定谷物青贮饲料(大麦与玉米),谷物(大麦与玉米玉米玉米玉米谷物50:50)的影响,它们对干物质摄入,瘤胃发酵,总沟消化率,氮气平衡和原位降解的相互作用(s×g)。玉米青贮饲料(CS)或大麦青贮饲料(BS)包括在8%的膳食干物质(DM)。在每个青贮源,饮食(DM基础)干轧大麦(BG; 86%),干轧玉米(CG; 85%),或大麦和玉米的相同混合物(混合; 85%)。期间为25天,5 d膳食过渡,13d膳食适应,7 d数据和样品收集。收集的样品包括饲料和拒绝,总尿液和粪便和瘤胃流体。使用SAS的混合模型进行分析所有数据,用SISAGE,谷物和S×G.干物质摄入(P≥019)和平均瘤胃pH(p≥0.096)不受青贮饲料,谷物的影响或S×G.混合的总短链脂肪酸浓度大于Bg或Cg(谷物,P = 0.003)和相对于BS的Cs(Simage,P = 0.009)。对于BS-BG和BS-CG(S×G,P <0.001),乙酸盐的摩尔比例越大,而丙酸盐的摩尔比例为相对于其他青贮和其他青贮饲料的CS-BG(S×G,P <0.001)更大。粮食源组合。 Cg的瘤胃氨-n浓度比bg更大,或者与Bs(青贮饲料,P = 0.023)相比,Cs的混合物(谷物,P <0.001),更大。对于BG(谷物,P≤0.035),DM,有机物,中性洗涤剂纤维,淀粉和总能量的表观总沟槽消化率最大。 BG(谷物,P = 0.029)的可消化能量含量(MCAL / kg)比CG和混合物更大。对于所有其他处理,Cs-Bg(S×g,p≤0.033)最大的氮保留(G / D和%)最大。 BG的DM,粗蛋白和淀粉的原位降解率大于CG(P≤0.004)。 CG的DM,粗蛋白和淀粉的潜在可降解的级分(P≤0.031)越大,而BG的未加工级分越大(P≤0.046)。对于青贮源,Cs具有更大的24小时,原位DM消化率(p = 0.009)和相对于BS的淀粉消化率(24,48和72小时孵育,P≤0.034)。结果表明,同时喂养Cs和Bg的组合促进丙种生产和更高的保留;观察到少量其他添加剂效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号