首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow Metabolism >Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance hybrid scanner imaging of cerebral blood flow using 15O-water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging in newborn piglets
【2h】

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance hybrid scanner imaging of cerebral blood flow using 15O-water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging in newborn piglets

机译:15O-水正电子发射断层扫描和动脉自旋标记磁共振成像对新生仔猪脑血流的正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振混合扫描仪成像

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abnormality in cerebral blood flow (CBF) distribution can lead to hypoxic–ischemic cerebral damage in newborn infants. The aim of the study was to investigate minimally invasive approaches to measure CBF by comparing simultaneous 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and single TI pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MR) on a hybrid PET/MR in seven newborn piglets. Positron emission tomography was performed with IV injections of 20 MBq and 100 MBq 15O-water to confirm CBF reliability at low activity. Cerebral blood flow was quantified using a one-tissue-compartment-model using two input functions: an arterial input function (AIF) or an image-derived input function (IDIF). The mean global CBF (95% CI) PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL at baseline were 27 (23; 32), 34 (31; 37), and 27 (22; 32) mL/100 g per minute, respectively. At acetazolamide stimulus, PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 64 (55; 74), 76 (70; 83) and 79 (67; 92) mL/100 g per minute, respectively. At baseline, differences between PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 22% (P<0.0001) and −0.7% (P=0.9). At acetazolamide, differences between PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 19% (P=0.001) and 24% (P=0.0003). In conclusion, PET-IDIF overestimated CBF. Injected activity of 20 MBq 15O-water had acceptable concordance with 100 MBq, without compromising image quality. Single TI ASL was questionable for regional CBF measurements. Global ASL CBF and PET CBF were congruent during baseline but not during hyperperfusion.
机译:脑血流(CBF)分布异常可导致新生儿缺氧缺血性脑损伤。本研究的目的是通过比较同时进行的 15 O-水正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单TI脉冲动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振成像(MR)来测量CBF的微创方法在7只新生仔猪中进行PET / MR混合杂交。正电子发射断层扫描是通过静脉内注射20 MBq和100 MBq 15 O-水进行的,以确认低活性下CBF的可靠性。使用两个输入函数:动脉输入函数(AIF)或图像输入函数(IDIF),使用一个组织隔室模型对脑血流进行定量。基线时的总体CBF(95%CI)PET-AIF,PET-IDIF和ASL平均为每分钟27(23; 32),34(31; 37)和27(22; 32)mL / 100 g,分别。在乙酰唑酰胺刺激下,PET-AIF,PET-IDIF和ASL分别为每分钟64(55; 74),76(70; 83)和79(67; 92)mL /100μg。在基线时,PET-AIF,PET-IDIF和ASL之间的差异为22%(P <0.0001)和-0.7%(P = 0.9)。使用乙酰唑胺时,PET-AIF,PET-IDIF和ASL之间的差异为19%(P = 0.001)和24%(P = 0.0003)。总之,PET-IDIF高估了CBF。注入的20 MBq 15 O-水的活性与100 acceptableMBq一致,并且不影响图像质量。单个TI ASL对于区域CBF测量存在疑问。总体ASL CBF和PET CBF在基线期间一致,但在高灌注期间则不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号