首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Using the Negative Soil Adjustment Factor of Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) to Resist Saturation Effects and Estimate Leaf Area Index (LAI) in Dense Vegetation Areas
【2h】

Using the Negative Soil Adjustment Factor of Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) to Resist Saturation Effects and Estimate Leaf Area Index (LAI) in Dense Vegetation Areas

机译:使用土壤调整后植被指数(SAVI)的负土壤调节因子来抵抗密集植被区的饱和效应和估计叶面积指数(LAI)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Saturation effects limit the application of vegetation indices (VIs) in dense vegetation areas. The possibility to mitigate them by adopting a negative soil adjustment factor X is addressed. Two leaf area index (LAI) data sets are analyzed using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) for validation. The first one is derived from observations of MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) from 16 April 2013, to 21 October 2020, in the Apiacás area. Its corresponding VIs are calculated from a combination of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 surface reflectance products. The second one is a global LAI dataset with VIs calculated from Landsat-5 surface reflectance products. A linear regression model is applied to both datasets to evaluate four VIs that are commonly used to estimate LAI: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), transformed SAVI (TSAVI), and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). The optimal soil adjustment factor of SAVI for LAI estimation is determined using an exhaustive search. The Dickey-Fuller test indicates that the time series of LAI data are stable with a confidence level of 99%. The linear regression results stress significant saturation effects in all VIs. Finally, the exhaustive searching results show that a negative soil adjustment factor of SAVI can mitigate the SAVIs’ saturation in the Apiacás area (i.e., X = −0.148 for mean LAI = 5.35), and more generally in areas with large LAI values (e.g., X = −0.183 for mean LAI = 6.72). Our study further confirms that the lower boundary of the soil adjustment factor can be negative and that using a negative soil adjustment factor improves the computation of time series of LAI.
机译:饱和效应限制了植被指数(VIS)在密集植被区的应用。通过采用负土壤调整因子X来缓解它们的可能性。使用Google地球发动机(GEE)进行验证,分析两个叶区域指数(LAI)数据集。第一个是从2013年4月16日到2020年10月16日的中度分辨率成像光谱辐射计(MODIS)的观察结果中的观察结果。其相应的VI是由哨照-2和Landsat-8表面反射产品的组合计算的。第二个是全球LAI数据集,该数据集来自Landsat-5表面反射产品计算。将线性回归模型应用于两种数据集,以评估四个常用于估计LAI:归一化差异植被指数(NDVI),土壤调整后植被指数(SAVI),转化的SAVI(TSAVI)和增强植被指数(EVI)的四个相符。 。使用详尽的搜索确定LAI估计SAVI的最佳土壤调整因子。 DICKEY-FULLER测试表明LAI数据的时间序列稳定,置信水平为99%。线性回归结果在所有VI中强调了显着的饱和效应。最后,详尽的搜索结果表明,Savi的负土壤调整因子可以减轻苹果酱区域(即x = -0.148的Savis饱和度(即表示平均Lai = 5.35),更普遍地在具有大的Lai值的区域(例如,x = -0.183用于平均lai = 6.72)。我们的研究进一步证实了土壤调节因子的下边界可以是阴性的,并且使用负土壤调节因子改善了赖时序列的计算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号