首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Facial Appearance and Psychosocial Features in Orthognathic Surgery: A FACE-Q- and 3D Facial Image-Based Comparative Study of Patient- Clinician- and Lay-Observer-Reported Outcomes
【2h】

Facial Appearance and Psychosocial Features in Orthognathic Surgery: A FACE-Q- and 3D Facial Image-Based Comparative Study of Patient- Clinician- and Lay-Observer-Reported Outcomes

机译:正颌手术中的面部外观和社会心理特征:基于FACE-Q和3D面部图像的患者临床医生和非观察员报告结果的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Outcome measures reported by patients, clinicians, and lay-observers can help to tailor treatment plans to meet patients’ needs. This study evaluated orthognathic surgery (OGS) outcomes using pre- and post-OGS patients’ (n = 84) FACE-Q reports, and a three-dimensional facial photograph-based panel assessment of facial appearance and psychosocial parameters, with 96 blinded layperson and orthodontic and surgical professional raters, and verified whether there were correlations between these outcome measurement tools. Post-OGS FACE-Q and panel assessment measurements showed significant (p < 0.001) differences from pre-OGS measurements. Pre-OGS patients’ FACE-Q scores were significantly (p < 0.01) lower than normal, age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched individuals’ (n = 54) FACE-Q scores, with no differences in post-OGS comparisons. The FACE-Q overall facial appearance scale had a low, statistically significant (p < 0.001) correlation to the facial-aesthetic-based panel assessment, but no correlation to the FACE-Q lower face and lips scales. No significant correlation was observed between the FACE-Q and panel assessment psychosocial-related scales. This study demonstrates that OGS treatment positively influences the facial appearance and psychosocial-related perceptions of patients, clinicians and lay observers, but that there is only a low, or no, correlation between the FACE-Q and panel assessment tools. Future investigations may consider the inclusion of both tools as OGS treatment endpoints for the improvement of patient-centered care, and guiding the health-system-related decision-making processes of multidisciplinary teams, policymakers, and other stakeholders.
机译:患者,临床医生和非专业观察员报告的结果指标可以帮助制定治疗计划,以满足患者的需求。这项研究使用OGS之前和之后的患者(n = 84)FACE-Q报告以及基于三维面部照片的面部外观和社会心理参数面板评估对正颌外科手术(OGS)的结果进行评估,其中96人为盲人以及正畸和外科专业评估者,并验证了这些结果测量工具之间是否存在相关性。 OGS后的FACE-Q和专家组评估显示与OGS之前的测量有显着差异(p <0.001)。 OGS之前患者的FACE-Q得分显着(p <0.01)低于正常,年龄,性别和种族匹配的个体(n = 54)的FACE-Q得分,OGS之后的比较无差异。 FACE-Q总体面部外观量表与基于面部美学的面板评估具有较低的,统计学上显着的相关性(p <0.001),但与FACE-Q下脸和嘴唇量表没有相关性。 FACE-Q与小组评估的心理社会相关量表之间未发现显着相关性。这项研究表明,OGS治疗对患者,临床医生和非专业观察者的面部外观和心理社会相关知觉有积极影响,但是FACE-Q与专家组评估工具之间的相关性很低,甚至没有。未来的调查可能会考虑将这两种工具作为OGS的治疗终点,以改善以患者为中心的护理,并指导多学科团队,政策制定者和其他利益相关方与卫生系统相关的决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号