首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Polymers >Numerical Study of Using FRP and Steel Rebars in Simply Supported Prestressed Concrete Beams with External FRP Tendons
【2h】

Numerical Study of Using FRP and Steel Rebars in Simply Supported Prestressed Concrete Beams with External FRP Tendons

机译:使用外部FRP肌腱的简单支持预应力混凝土梁使用FRP和钢钢筋的数值研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed at examining the feasibility of using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) rebars instead of steel ones in prestressed concrete beams (PCBs) with external FRP tendons. By applying an experimentally validated program, numerical tests were performed on simply supported PCBs, with investigated variables including rebars’ type and area. Three types of rebars were considered, i.e., carbon, glass FRPs (CFRP, GFRP), and reinforcing steel. The ratio of tensile rebars ranged from 0.22% to 2.16%. The results indicated that the beams with CFRP rebars exhibited better crack mode and higher ultimate load than the beams with GFRP or steel rebars. GFRP rebars led to considerably higher ultimate deflection and tendon stress increment than steel rebars. In addition, several models for calculating the ultimate stress in unbonded tendons were assessed. An analytical model was also proposed to predict the tendon stress at ultimate and flexural strength in externally PCBs with steel and FRP rebars. The model predictions agreed well with the numerical results.
机译:本研究旨在检查使用纤维增强聚合物(FRP)钢筋的可行性而不是预应力混凝土梁(PCB)中的钢材,外部FRP肌腱。通过应用实验验证的程序,在简单支持的PCB上进行数值测试,具有调查的变量,包括钢筋类型和区域。考虑了三种类型的钢筋,即碳,玻璃FRPS(CFRP,GFRP)和钢筋。拉伸钢筋的比例范围为0.22%至2.16%。结果表明,具有CFRP钢筋的光束表现出比具有GFRP或钢钢筋的光束更好的裂缝模式和更高的最终负载。 GFRP钢筋导致比钢筋更高的终极偏转和肌腱应力增量。此外,评估了用于计算未粘结肌腱中的最终应力的若干模型。还提出了一种分析模型,以预测外部PCB的钢铁和FRP钢板的终极和弯曲强度的肌腱应力。模型预测与数值效果很好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号