首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Global Health >Factors influencing the sustainability of digital health interventions in low-resource settings: Lessons from five countries
【2h】

Factors influencing the sustainability of digital health interventions in low-resource settings: Lessons from five countries

机译:影响低资源环境中数字健康干预措施可持续性的因素:五个国家的课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Digital health – which includes the development and use of digital technologies and data to improve health outcomes [1] – has emerged in the past decade as a potential ‘game changer’ for enabling accessible, affordable and effective health care for all [2]. Digital health projects often involve relatively modest mobile technologies, such as short messaging service (SMS) text messaging, to address some of the most persistent barriers in health systems such as distance to services or cost [3,4]. Optimism about the potential value of digital health resulted in a flurry of pilot implementation projects undertaken over the past decade. Alas, the majority of these have failed to translate into scaled, routine services, leaving many health leaders cautious and uncertain of how to proceed [5,6]. Despite the obvious potential, there are inherent complexities that beset implementation, starting from the source of the concept (who decided on a digital intervention? on what grounds?) through to assessing the impact (who benefited? who didn’t? how do we know?).
机译:数字健康 - 包括在过去的十年中出现了用于改善健康结果的数字技术和数据的开发和使用,以实现所有的“游戏更换者”,以便为所有人提供可访问,价格实惠和有效的医疗保健[2]。数字健康项目通常涉及相对谦虚的移动技术,例如短消息服务(SMS)短信,以解决诸如与服务距离或成本的卫生系统中的一些最持久的障碍[3,4]。关于数字健康潜在价值的乐观态度导致了过去十年进行的试点实施项目。唉,这些的大部分都未能转化为扩展,常规服务,让许多卫生领导者谨慎,不确定如何继续[5,6]。尽管有明显的潜力,但是从概念来源开始,存在困扰的内在复杂性(谁决定数字干预?在什么理由?)通过评估影响(谁受益?谁没有?我们如何呢?知道?)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号