Feasibility study of using Stereotactic Field Diode for field output factors measurement and evaluating three new detectors for small field relative dosimetry of 6 and 10 MV photon beams

摘要

This study assesses the feasibility of using stereotactic field diode (SFD) as an alternate to gaf chromic films for field output factor (FF) measurement and further evaluating three new detectors for small field dosimetry. Varian 21EX linear accelerator was used to generate 6 and 10 MV beams of nominal square fields ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2. One passive (EBT3 films) and five active detectors including IBA RAZOR diode(RD), SFD, RAZOR nanochamber (RNC), pinpoint chamber ({"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023), and semiflex chamber ({"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31010","term_id":"1377870328"}}PTW31010) were employed. FFs were measured using films and SFD while beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) distribution were acquired with active detectors. Polarity (kpol) and recombination (ks) effects of ion chambers were determined and corrected for output ratio measurement. Correction factors (CF) of RD, RNC, and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023 in axial and radial orientation were also measured. Stereotactic field diode measured FFs have shown good agreement with films (with difference of <1%). RD and RNC measured beam profiles were within 3% deviation from the SFD values. Variation in kpol with field size for RNC and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023 was up to 4% and 0.4% (for fields ≥ 1 × 1 cm2), respectively, while variation in ks of {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023 was <0.2 %. The maximum values of CF have been calculated to be 5.2%, 2.0%, 13.6%, and 25.5% for RD, RNC, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023‐axial, and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"PTW31023","term_id":"1377870341"}}PTW31023‐radial respectively. This study concludes that SFD with appropriate CFs as given in TRS 483 may be used for measuring FFs as an alternate to EBT3 films. Whereas RD and RNC may be used for beam profile and PDD measurement in small fields. Considering the limit of usability of 2%, RNC may be used without CF for FF measurement in the smallfields investigated in this study.