首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe
【2h】

HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe

机译:HTA机构需要证据知识的审议流程就通过全球卫生技术评估机构使用证据知识的审议程序

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are at least two reasons why health technology assessment (HTA) agencies need to seek process-based solutions to support the legitimacy of healthcare resource allocation, ie, (i) in pluralistic societies, the existence of often conflicting and incommensurable claims (ie, the "fragmentation of value") and the lack of a broadly accepted, ethically defensible analytical framework, and (ii) the well-documented loopholes of the conventional logic of cost-effectiveness (CE) with its reductionist concept of allocative efficiency, which fails to reflect the distributive dimension of resource allocation decisions in collectively financed health schemes.
机译:健康技术评估(HTA)机构需要寻求基于过程的解决方案,以支持医疗保健资源分配的合法性,即(i)在多元社会中,存在经常相互冲突和不堪一体的索赔(即, “价值碎片”)和缺乏广泛接受的,道德可靠的分析框架,(ii)具有其减少效率的常规逻辑(CE)的常规逻辑的良好记录漏洞,其失败反映集体资助卫生计划中资源分配决策的分配维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号