首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Healthcare >Do High Psychopaths Care More about Moral Consequences than Low Psychopaths in Chinese Culture? An Exploration Using the CNI Model
【2h】

Do High Psychopaths Care More about Moral Consequences than Low Psychopaths in Chinese Culture? An Exploration Using the CNI Model

机译:在中国文化中的低精神病患者中高精神病院是否更多地关心道德后果?使用CNI模型的探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Fewer studies are about the influence of psychopath traits on moral judgment and the underlying psychological mechanism in Chinese cultural background. In this paper, we use the creative CNI (Consequences, Norms, Inaction versus action) model to quantify the subject’s reaction to moral dilemmas. Method: In this research, the Chinese version of the Levenson Psychopathic Scale, CNI model materials, and a multinomial model to further analyze the associations among the psychopathy characteristics and utilitarian moral judgment are applied. The CNI model is proposed by Gawronski et al., which can quantify the subjects’ sensitivity to moral consequence, sensitivity to moral norms, and the general preference for inaction or action in moral dilemmas. Result: This study finds that there were significant differences in the utilitarian moral judgment between the groups, t (360) = 3.24, p = 0.001, and Cohen’s d = 0.36. The analysis results of the CNI model show that the high psychopathy group on the N parameter was significantly lower than the group of low psychopathy, ΔG2 (2) = 79.70, p = 0.001. In terms of the C parameter, we found no significant distinctions between the two groups, ΔG2 (2) = 1.356, p = 0.244. For the I parameter, the two groups also have no significant differences, ΔG2 (2) = 0.093, p = 0.76. Conclusion: Persons with high psychopathy traits prefer to make more utilitarian moral judgments and have a weak sensitivity to moral norms (N). The sensitivity to consequences (C) of the two groups is no significant difference. The general preference for inaction versus action (I) also has no significant differences between those two groups. Moreover, the CNI model fits well in Chinese subjects.
机译:目的:较少的研究是关于精神病患者特质对道德判断的影响以及中国文化背景的潜在心理机制。在本文中,我们使用创意CNI(后果,规范,无所作为与动作)模型来量化对象对道德困境的反应。方法:在本研究中,中文版的levenson精神病秤,CNI模型材料和多项式模型,进一步分析了精神病特征和功利主义道德判断的关联。 CNI模型由Gawronski等人提出,这可以量化对道德后果的敏感性,对道德规范的敏感性,以及在道德困境中的无所作为或行动的一般偏好。结果:本研究发现,组,T(360)= 3.24,P = 0.001和Cohen的D = 0.36之间的功利造型道德判断存在显着差异。 CNI模型的分析结果表明,N参数上的高精神病组显着低于低精神病组,ΔG2(2)= 79.70,P = 0.001。就C参数而言,我们发现两组之间没有显着的区别,ΔG2(2)= 1.356,P = 0.244。对于I参数,两组也没有显着差异,ΔG2(2)= 0.093,P = 0.76。结论:具有高精度性状的人更愿意制作更具功利的道德判断,对道德规范有薄弱的敏感性(n)。两组后果(c)的敏感性无统计学意义。无所作为与动作的一般偏好(i)在这两组之间也没有显着差异。此外,CNI模型适用于中国科目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号