首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered group-based pain management programme in improving pain-related disability for people with persistent pain—protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (iSelf-help trial)
【2h】

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered group-based pain management programme in improving pain-related disability for people with persistent pain—protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (iSelf-help trial)

机译:在线提供的基于团体的基于团体的痛苦管理计划的临床和成本效益从而改善了对持续止痛协议的痛苦相关的残疾以获得非劣级的随机对照试验(ISELF-HELM帮助审判)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Persistent non-cancer pain affects one in five adults and is more common in Māori—the Indigenous population of New Zealand (NZ), adults over 65 years, and people living in areas of high deprivation. Despite the evidence supporting multidisciplinary pain management programmes (PMPs), access to PMPs is poor due to long waiting lists. Although online-delivered PMPs enhance access, none have been codesigned with patients or compared with group-based, in-person PMPs. This non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a cocreated, culturally appropriate, online-delivered PMP (iSelf-help) compared with in-person PMP in reducing pain-related disability.
机译:持续的非癌症疼痛会影响五分之一的成人,更常见于毛利 - 新西兰(新西兰)的土着人口,成年人超过65岁,人们生活在高剥夺领域。尽管证据支持多学科疼痛管理计划(PMP),但由于等候名单,由于等候名单,对PMP的访问很差。虽然在线交付的PMPS增强了访问,但没有人与患者进行了代号,或与基于组的群体的PMP相比。这种非劣势试验旨在评估与在降低疼痛相关残疾的人的PMP相比,评估COCRATED,文化合适的在线交付的PMP(ISELF-HELL)的临床和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号