首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epilepsia Open >Man and the machine rise to the spike‐wave. Commentary on An automated machine learning‐based detection algorithm for spike‐wave discharges (SWDs) in a mouse model of absence epilepsy.
【2h】

Man and the machine rise to the spike‐wave. Commentary on An automated machine learning‐based detection algorithm for spike‐wave discharges (SWDs) in a mouse model of absence epilepsy.

机译:男人和机器上升到尖峰波。 缺乏癫痫鼠标模型中基于机器学习的基于机器学习的检测算法的评论。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anyone who has spent a considerable amount of time in visual analysis and manual scoring of EEG events of either human or animal long‐term EEG recordings fully understands that the process is not entirely a labor of love. Manual review of large volumes of EEG data, whether for detection of ictal discharges, epileptiform activity, or abnormal slowing, is notoriously time‐consuming, fatigue‐inducing, and frequently inexact. Numerous analytical software programs have been developed over the last several decades to aid visual review of continuous EEG recordings and have contributed significantly to the precision and accuracy of event detection. However, event detection by even the best algorithms remains an imperfect science. The ongoing need to build better analytical “mousetraps” for EEG event capture continues to be a daunting challenge for epileptologists, computer scientists, and basic researchers.
机译:任何在人类或动物长期EEG记录的脑电图事件中花费相当长的时间的人都完全明白该过程并不完全是爱的劳动。手工评论大量的脑电图数据,无论是检测ICTAL排放,癫痫型活动还是异常放缓,都是令人惊叹的耗时,疲劳诱导和经常不精确的。在过去的几十年中已经开发了许多分析软件计划,以帮助视觉审查连续EEG记录,并对事件检测的精度和准确性大致贡献。然而,即使是最好的算法也仍然是一个不完美的科学的事件检测。正在进行的需要为EEG事件捕获构建更好的分析“捕鼠器”仍然是脱渗精剂,计算机科学家和基础研究人员的艰巨挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号