首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley Public Health Emergency Collection >How Can We Quarantine Without a Home? Responses of Activism and Urban Social Movements in Times of COVID‐19 Pandemic Crisis in Lisbon
【2h】

How Can We Quarantine Without a Home? Responses of Activism and Urban Social Movements in Times of COVID‐19 Pandemic Crisis in Lisbon

机译:我们如何在没有房屋的情况下隔离?里斯本发生COVID-19大流行危机时行动主义和城市社会运动的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In Lisbon, during the COVID‐19 pandemic period, new spaces for contestation and the action of urban social movements intensified, capitalising on the visibility for the right to housing, as a basic human right and an unconditional public health imperative, to fulfil the duties of lockdown and social isolation, imposed by the State of Exception. Its narrative and strategies reinforces the counter‐hegemonic movement that denounces the logics of commodification and financialisation in the housing sector, placing hope in a post‐capitalist transition in the post‐COVID horizon. We conclude that the actors in this urban struggle have limited power over the changes they initiate, or make an effort to inflict, if they are not involved in a concerted and politically integrated action, not least because the achievements they obtain are temporary and exceptional, like the state of emergency imposed by COVID‐19.
机译:在里斯本,在COVID-19大流行期间,人们利用住房权作为一项基本人权和无条件公共卫生的必要条件,加强了竞争和城市社会运动行动的新空间,例外状态造成的封锁和社会隔离。它的叙述和策略加强了反霸权运动,该运动谴责了住房领域的商品化和金融化逻辑,为在后COVID时代的后资本主义过渡寄予了希望。我们得出的结论是,如果他们没有参与一致的政治整合行动,那么这场城市斗争中的参与者对发起或努力做出的改变的权力是有限的,这不仅是因为他们获得的成就是暂时的和杰出的,就像COVID-19施加的紧急状态一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号