首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection >Price wars and price collusion in Chinas airline markets
【2h】

Price wars and price collusion in Chinas airline markets

机译:中国航空市场的价格战和价格合谋

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the absence of an effective antitrust law, both fare wars and price collusion have been pervasive in China's airline markets, causing concern for both airlines and consumers. A study of monthly airfare data from 2002 to 2004 confirms that fare wars occur periodically, as well as price collusion. Both tend to be short-lived. The fact that collusion is more likely to occur in January and April when demand is high, as revealed by China Eastern's and China Southern's price-war and collusion models, has been confirmed by interview information obtained from the airlines' sales managers. However, there is also evidence in these models suggesting that collusion can be more easily formed when demand is low. High airport concentration measured by the HHI may facilitate collusion in certain circumstances, but it may also lead to more price wars under other conditions. Concentration in both airports and routes does not appear to systematically affect the occurrence of fare wars and collusion in all the models estimated. We also reject the possibility that mutual forbearance due to multimarket contact plays any important anti-competitive role in China's airline markets.
机译:在缺乏有效的反托拉斯法的情况下,票价战和价格合谋在中国的航空市场中无处不在,引起了航空公司和消费者的关注。对2002年至2004年每月机票数据的研究证实,票价战是周期性发生的,而且价格勾结是周期性的。两者往往都是短暂的。从东方航空公司和中国南方航空公司的价格战和勾结模型可以看出,在需求高涨的一月和四月,勾结更有可能发生,这一事实已经从航空公司销售经理那里获得的采访信息得到证实。但是,在这些模型中也有证据表明,当需求较低时,可以更容易形成合谋。 HHI衡量的高机场集中度在某些情况下可能有助于串通,但在其他情况下也可能导致更多的价格战。在所有估计的模型中,机场和航线的集中度似乎都不会系统地影响票价战和合谋的发生。我们也拒绝因多市场接触而相互宽容在中国航空市场中发挥任何重要的反竞争作用的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号