首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study
【2h】

Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study

机译:使用数值模拟和分析程序分析骑车人对空中位置的阻力:一个案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Resistance acting on a cyclist is a major concern among the cycling fraternity. Most of the testing methods require previous training or expensive equipment and time-consuming set-ups. By contrast, analytical procedures are more affordable and numerical simulations are perfect for manipulating and controlling inputs. The aim of this case study was to compare the drag of a cyclist in the aero position as measured using numerical simulation and analytical procedures. Methods: An elite male cyclist (65 kg in mass and 1.72 m in height) volunteered to take part in this research. The cyclist was wearing his competition gear, helmet and bicycle. A three-dimensional model of the bicycle and cyclist in the aero position was obtained to run the numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a set of analytical procedures were carried out to assess drag, frontal area and drag coefficient, between 1 m/s and 22 m/s, with increments of 1 m/s. The t-test paired samples and linear regression were selected to compare, correlate and assess the methods agreement. Results: No significant differences ( = 2.826; = 0.275) between CFD and analytical procedures were found. The linear regression showed a very high adjustment for drag (R = 0.995; < 0.001). However, the drag values obtained by the analytical procedures seemed to be overestimated, even though without effect (d = 0.11). Conclusions: These findings suggest that drag might be assessed using both a set of analytical procedures and CFD.
机译:背景:对骑自行车的人的抵抗力是自行车运动中的主要关注点。大多数测试方法需要事先培训或昂贵的设备和费时的设置。相比之下,分析程序更经济实惠,而数值模拟非常适合操纵和控制输入。本案例研究的目的是比较使用数值模拟和分析程序测得的骑车人在空气位置的阻力。方法:一名重量为65公斤,身高为1.72 m的精英男性自行车手自愿参加这项研究。骑自行车的人戴着他的比赛装备,头盔和自行车。获得了在空气位置的自行车和骑车人的三维模型以进行数值模拟。进行了计算流体动力学(CFD)和一套分析程序,以评估阻力,额叶面积和阻力系数,范围为1 m / s至22 m / s,增量为1 m / s。选择t检验配对的样本和线性回归来比较,关联和评估方法的一致性。结果:CFD和分析程序之间没有发现显着差异(= 2.826; = 0.275)。线性回归显示阻力调整非常高(R = 0.995; <0.001)。但是,即使没有影响,通过分析程序获得的阻力值似乎也被高估了(d = 0.11)。结论:这些发现表明可以使用一套分析程序和CFD来评估阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号