首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Evaluation of a Novel Ear Pulse Oximeter: Towards Automated Oxygen Titration in Eyeglass Frames
【2h】

Evaluation of a Novel Ear Pulse Oximeter: Towards Automated Oxygen Titration in Eyeglass Frames

机译:新型耳式脉搏血氧仪的评估:在眼镜框架中实现自动氧滴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current oxygen delivery modes lack monitoring and can be cumbersome for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Integrating a pulse oximeter and nasal oxygen cannulas into eyeglasses would reduce the burden of current solutions. An ear pulse oximeter (OxyFrame) was evaluated on 16 healthy volunteers and 20 hypoxemic patients with chronic respiratory diseases undergoing a prespecified protocol simulating daily activities. Correlation, error, and accuracy root mean square error (A ) were calculated to compare S O measured by OxyFrame, a standard pulse oximeter (MASIMO), and arterial blood gas analysis (aBGA). S O measured by OxyFrame and MASIMO correlated strongly in volunteers, with low error and high accuracy (r = 0.85, error = 0.2 ± 2.9%, A = 2.88%). Performances were similar in patients (r = 0.87, error 0 ± 2.5%, A = 2.49% compared with MASIMO; and r = 0.93, error = 0.4 ± 1.9%, A = 1.94% compared with aBGA). However, the percentage of rejected measurements was high (volunteers 77.2%, patients 46.9%). The OxyFrame cavum conchae pulse oximeter was successfully evaluated, and demonstrated accurate S O measurements, compliant with ISO 80601-2-61:2017. Several reasons for the high rejection rate were identified, and potential solutions were proposed, which might be valuable for optimization of the sensor hardware.
机译:当前的氧气输送模式缺乏监控,并且对于患有慢性呼吸系统疾病的患者可能很麻烦。将脉搏血氧仪和鼻氧插管集成到眼镜中将减少当前解决方案的负担。耳脉血氧仪(OxyFrame)对16名健康志愿者和20名患有低氧血症的慢性呼吸道疾病患者进行了评估,这些患者正在接受模拟日常活动的预定规程。计算相关性,误差和准确度的均方根误差(A),以比较通过OxyFrame,标准脉搏血氧仪(MASIMO)和动脉血气分析(aBGA)测量的S O。 OxyFrame和MASIMO在志愿者中测得的S O密切相关,误差低且准确性高(r = 0.85,误差= 0.2±2.9%,A = 2.88%)。患者的表现相似(与MASIMO相比,r = 0.87,误差0±2.5%,A = 2.49%;与aBGA相比,r = 0.93,误差= 0.4±1.9%,A = 1.94%)。但是,拒绝测量的百分比很高(志愿者为77.2%,患者为46.9%)。已成功评估OxyFrame腔静脉脉搏血氧仪,并证明其准确的S O测量值符合ISO 80601-2-61:2017。确定了高拒绝率的几个原因,并提出了潜在的解决方案,这可能对优化传感器硬件很有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号