首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District Rwanda
【2h】

Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District Rwanda

机译:基于机器学习模型的降雨诱发滑坡预测:以卢旺达Ngororero区为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Landslides fall under natural, unpredictable and most distractive disasters. Hence, early warning systems of such disasters can alert people and save lives. Some of the recent early warning models make use of Internet of Things to monitor the environmental parameters to predict the disasters. Some other models use machine learning techniques (MLT) to analyse rainfall data along with some internal parameters to predict these hazards. The prediction capability of the existing models and systems are limited in terms of their accuracy. In this research paper, two prediction modelling approaches, namely random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR), are proposed. These approaches use rainfall datasets as well as various other internal and external parameters for landslide prediction and hence improve the accuracy. Moreover, the prediction performance of these approaches is further improved using antecedent cumulative rainfall data. These models are evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics, area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and false negative rate (FNR) to measure the landslide cases that were not reported. When antecedent rainfall data is included in the prediction, both models (RF and LR) performed better with an AUC of 0.995 and 0.997, respectively. The results proved that there is a good correlation between antecedent precipitation and landslide occurrence rather than between one-day rainfall and landslide occurrence. In terms of incorrect predictions, RF and LR improved FNR to 10.58% and 5.77% respectively. It is also noted that among the various internal factors used for prediction, slope angle has the highest impact than other factors. Comparing both the models, LR model’s performance is better in terms of FNR and it could be preferred for landslide prediction and early warning. LR model’s incorrect prediction rate FNR = 9.61% without including antecedent precipitation data and 3.84% including antecedent precipitation data.
机译:滑坡属于自然,不可预测和最具干扰性的灾难。因此,此类灾难的预警系统可以提醒人们并挽救生命。最近的一些早期预警模型利用物联网监视环境参数以预测灾难。其他一些模型则使用机器学习技术(MLT)来分析降雨数据以及一些内部参数来预测这些危害。现有模型和系统的预测能力在准确性方面受到限制。在本文中,提出了两种预测建模方法,即随机森林(RF)和逻辑回归(LR)。这些方法将降雨数据集以及各种其他内部和外部参数用于滑坡预测,从而提高了准确性。此外,使用先前的累积降雨数据可以进一步提高这些方法的预测性能。使用接收器的工作特性,曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)和假阴性率(FNR)对这些模型进行评估,以测量未报告的滑坡情况。当预测中包含前期降雨数据时,两个模型(RF和LR)的AUC值分别为0.995和0.997,效果更好。结果证明,前期降水与滑坡发生之间存在良好的相关性,而不是一日降雨与滑坡发生之间存在良好的相关性。对于错误的预测,RF和LR将FNR分别提高到10.58%和5.77%。还应注意,在用于预测的各种内部因素中,倾斜角的影响最大。将这两个模型进行比较,就FNR而言,LR模型的性能要好一些,它可能是滑坡预测和预警的首选。 LR模型的不正确预测率FNR = 9.61%(不包括先前的降水数据)和3.84%(包括先前的降水数据)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号