首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hip Pelvis >Does Platelet-rich Plasma Augmentation Following Hip Arthroscopy Improve Outcomes: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Does Platelet-rich Plasma Augmentation Following Hip Arthroscopy Improve Outcomes: A Systematic Review

机译:髋关节镜检查后富含血小板的血浆增强是否改善结果:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gathered widespread acceptance among orthopaedic surgeons because of its multimodal effects on tissue healing. Varying results have been reported when PRP injections are combined with hip arthroscopic surgery. To evaluate the influence of PRP on clinical outcomes following hip arthroscopy. We hypothesized that patients treated with PRP would have improved postoperative outcome scores. A search of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) healthcare database advanced search (HDAS) via Athens (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and AMED databases) was conducted from their years of inception to May 2018 with the keywords: “Hip Arthroscopy” and “Platelet-Rich Plasma”. A quality assessment was performed based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Three studies were included for analysis; two of which had low risk of bias. The studies included 363 hips, of which 141 were randomised for PRP treatment. The mean age of all patients was 35 years and the follow-up ranged from 18.5 to 36 months. Authors used different PRP systems and preparations. Modified Harris hip score was reported in all three studies with two studies favouring the use of PRP. The use of PRP following hip arthroscopy did not lead to significantly improved postoperative pain or functional outcomes when compared to control groups in the studies included in this review.
机译:富含血小板的血浆(PRP)由于其对组织愈合的多模式影响而已在整形外科医生中获得了广泛的接受。当PRP注射与髋关节镜手术相结合时,已报道了多种结果。为了评估髋关节镜检查后PRP对临床结果的影响。我们假设接受PRP治疗的患者术后结局评分会提高。从成立至今至2018年5月,通过雅典(PubMed,MEDLINE,CINAHL,EMBASE和AMED数据库)对美国国立卫生研究院(NICE)的医疗数据库高级搜索(HDAS)进行了搜索,关键词为: “髋关节镜”和“富含血小板的血浆”。基于Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行了质量评估。分析包括三项研究;其中两个偏见风险低。这项研究包括363髋,其中141随机分配用于PRP治疗。所有患者的平均年龄为35岁,随访时间为18.5至36个月。作者使用了不同的PRP系统和准备工作。在所有三项研究中均报告了改良的Harris髋关节评分,其中两项研究赞成使用PRP。与本评价纳入研究的对照组相比,髋关节镜检查后使用PRP并未显着改善术后疼痛或功能结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号