首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animal Nutrition >Body weight and range usage affect net energy utilisation in commercial free-range laying hens when evaluated in net energy chambers
【2h】

Body weight and range usage affect net energy utilisation in commercial free-range laying hens when evaluated in net energy chambers

机译:在净能室内进行评估时体重和范围的使用会影响商业散养蛋鸡的净能量利用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within a given free-range flock, some hens prefer to spend the majority of their time in the shed (stayers), while others frequently access the range (rangers). Laying performance has been associated not only with the development of these sub-populations but also with different body weights (BW). The purpose of this study was to determine if range usage, BW or a combination of both is associated with energy metabolism and as such contribute to improved hen performance. Forty-eight Lohmann Brown hens at 74 wk of age were selected from a commercial free-range farm based on their BW and range usage over a 56-week period. Using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, hens were either classified as heavy (mean ± SEM; 2.01 ± 0.02 kg,  = 24) or light (1.68 ± 0.01 kg,  = 24), and also classified as rangers (accessed the range for 84.1% of available days, 242 ± 3.75 d;  = 24) or stayers (accessed the range for 7.17% of available days; 23.4 ± 6.08 d,  = 24). Stayers had significantly higher metabolizable energy (ME) intake per metabolic BW per d (0.852 vs. 0.798 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.025), higher heat production (0.637 vs. 0.607 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.005), higher heat increment (0.267 vs. 0.237 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.005) and retained more nitrogen (1.59 vs. 1.46 g/hen per d;  0.023) compared to the rangers. Light hens had significantly higher metabolic energy intake per metabolic BW (0.854 vs. 0.796 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.018), net energy (NE) intake (0.595 vs. 0.551 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.032), and retained energy (0.225 vs. 0.181 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.032), as well as lower heat production (0.936 vs. 1.003 MJ/hen per d;  0.002) compared to heavier hens. An interaction was observed across levels of analysis i.e. between light stayers and light rangers. The light rangers had significantly higher NE intake compared to the light stayers (9.77 vs. 9.27 MJ/kg BW per d;  0.024). In conclusion, light hens were more energy efficient compared to heavy hens. Moreover, light rangers had a more efficient feed utilisation compared to the light stayers.
机译:在给定的放养群中,有些母鸡喜欢将大部分时间都花在棚子里(寄宿者),而其他一些母鸡则经常出入鸡场(别动队)。产蛋性能不仅与这些亚群的发育有关,而且与体重(BW)不同有关。这项研究的目的是确定范围使用,体重或两者的结合是否与能量代谢有关,从而有助于提高母鸡的生产性能。从56周龄的38周龄Lohmann Brown母鸡中选择了一个商业自由放养农场,基于它们的体重和范围使用情况。使用2×2因子分解法,母鸡被分为重(平均±SEM; 2.01±0.02 kg,= 24)或轻(1.68±0.01 kg,= 24),也被分类为游骑兵(访问范围为84.1可用天数的百分比,即242±3.75天; = 24)或停留者(访问范围为可用天数的7.17%; 23.4±6.08天,= 24)。住院者每d每代谢BW的代谢能(ME)摄入量显着更高(0.852 vs.0.798 MJ / kg BW per d; 0.025),更高的产热量(0.637 vs. 0.607 MJ / kg BW per d; 0.005),更高的热量与游骑兵相比,增加(0.267 vs.0.237 MJ / kg BW每d; 0.005)并保留更多的氮(1.59 vs.1.46 g / hen每d; 0.023)。轻蛋鸡的每代谢BW的代谢能量摄入量显着更高(0.854 vs.0.796 MJ / kg BW / d; 0.018),净能量(NE)摄入量(0.595 vs.0.551 MJ / kg BW / d; 0.032)和保留能量(0.225 vs. 0.181MJ / kg BW / d; 0.032)以及较低的产热量(0.936 vs.1.003 MJ / hen / d; 0.002)在整个分析级别上都观察到了交互作用,即在光保持器和光测距仪之间。与光保持者相比,光别动队员的NE摄入量明显更高(9.77 vs.9.27 MJ / kg BW / d; 0.024)。总之,轻型母鸡比重型母鸡更节能。此外,与光保持器相比,光保持器的饲料利用率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号