首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >Integrated and differentiated methadone and HIV care for people who use drugs: a qualitative study in Kenya with implications for implementation science
【2h】

Integrated and differentiated methadone and HIV care for people who use drugs: a qualitative study in Kenya with implications for implementation science

机译:美沙酮和艾滋病毒的综合和区别对待:吸毒人群:肯尼亚的一项定性研究对实施科学具有重要意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Integrating methadone and HIV care is a priority in many low- and middle-income settings experiencing a growing challenge of HIV epidemics linked to injecting drug use. There is as yet little understanding of how to integrate methadone and HIV care in these settings and how such services can be implemented; such a gap reflects, in part, limitations in theorizing an implementation science of integrated care. In response, we qualitatively explored the delivery of methadone after its introduction in Kenya to understand integration with HIV care. Semi-structured interviews with people using methadone (  = 30) were supplemented by stakeholder interviews (  = 2) and participant observation in one city. Thematic analysis was used, that also drew on Mol’s logic of care as an analytical framework. Respondents described methadone clinic-based care embedded in community support systems. Daily observed clinic care was challenging for methadone and stigmatizing for HIV treatment. In response to these challenges, integration evolved and HIV care differentiated to other sites. The resulting care system was acceptable to respondents and allowed for choice over locations and approaches to HIV care. Using Mol’s logic of care as an analytical framework, we explore what led to this differentiation in integrated care. We explore co-production and experimentation around HIV care that compares with more limited experimentation for methadone. This experimentation is bounded by available discourses and materials. The study supports continued integration of services whilst allowing for differentiation of these models to adapt to client preferences. Co-location of integrated services must prioritize clinic organization that prevents HIV status disclosure. Our analysis fosters a material perspective for theory of implementation science and integration of services that focuses attention on local experimentation shaped by context.
机译:在许多中低收入地区,与注射毒品有关的艾滋病毒流行挑战日益严峻,将美沙酮和艾滋病毒治疗相结合是当务之急。对于如何在这些环境中整合美沙酮和艾滋病毒护理以及如何实施此类服务,人们还缺乏了解;这种差距部分反映了在理论上综合护理实施科学方面的局限性。对此,我们定性地研究了美沙酮在肯尼亚引入后的交付情况,以了解与艾滋病毒治疗的结合。在一个城市中,通过利益相关者访谈((= 2)和参与者观察来补充对使用美沙酮的人进行的半结构式访谈(= 30)。使用了主题分析,这也借鉴了摩尔的护理逻辑作为分析框架。受访者描述了嵌入社区支持系统中的基于美沙酮诊所的护理。每日观察到的临床护理对于美沙酮和艾滋病毒的污名化具有挑战性。为应对这些挑战,融合不断发展,艾滋病毒的护理也与其他地区有所不同。最终的护理系统为受访者所接受,并允许他们选择艾滋病毒的护理位置和方法。使用Mol的护理逻辑作为分析框架,我们探索了导致综合护理差异化的原因。我们探索与艾滋病毒护理相关的联合生产和实验,与美沙酮的更为有限的实验相比。该实验受可用的论述和材料的限制。该研究支持服务的持续集成,同时允许区分这些模型以适应客户的偏好。综合服务的主机代管必须优先考虑防止艾滋病毒状况披露的诊所组织。我们的分析为实施科学和服务集成理论提供了物质视角,使人们将注意力集中在因地制宜的本地实验上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号