首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >The GA-BPNN-Based Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality in the PSR Framework Using Gaofen-1 Satellite Data
【2h】

The GA-BPNN-Based Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality in the PSR Framework Using Gaofen-1 Satellite Data

机译:基于高分一号卫星数据的基于PBP框架的GA-BPNN耕地质量评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rapid and efficient assessment of cultivated land quality (CLQ) using remote sensing technology is of great significance for protecting cultivated land. However, it is difficult to obtain accurate CLQ estimates using the current satellite-driven approaches in the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework, owing to the limitations of linear models and CLQ spectral indices. In order to improve the estimation accuracy of CLQ, this study used four evaluation models (the traditional linear model; partial least squares regression, PLSR; back propagation neural network, BPNN; and BPNN with genetic algorithm optimization, GA-BPNN) to evaluate CLQ for determining the accurate evaluation model. In addition, the optimal satellite-derived indicator in the land state index was selected among five vegetation indices (the normalized vegetation index, NDVI; enhanced vegetation index, EVI; modified soil-adjusted vegetation index, MSAVI; perpendicular vegetation index, PVI; and soil-adjusted vegetation index, SAVI) to improve the prediction accuracy of CLQ. This study was conducted in Conghua District of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China, based on Gaofen-1 (GF-1) data. The prediction accuracies from the traditional linear model, PLSR, BPNN, and GA-BPNN were compared using observations. The results demonstrated that (1) compared with other models (the traditional linear model: R = 0.14 and RMSE = 91.53; PLSR: R = 0.33 and RMSE = 74.58; BPNN: R = 0.50 and RMSE = 61.75), the GA-BPNN model based on EVI in the land state index provided the most accurate estimates of CLQ, with the R of 0.59 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 56.87, indicating a nonlinear relationship between CLQ and the prediction indicator; and (2) the GA-BPNN-based evaluation approach of CLQ in the PSR framework was driven to map CLQ of the study area using the GF-1 data, leading to an RMSE of 61.44 at the regional scale, implying that the GA-BPNN-based evaluation approach has the potential to map CLQ over large areas. This study provides an important reference for the high-accuracy prediction of CLQ based on remote sensing technology.
机译:利用遥感技术快速有效地评估耕地质量对保护耕地具有重要意义。但是,由于线性模型和CLQ光谱指数的局限性,在压力状态响应(PSR)框架中使用当前的卫星驱动方法很难获得准确的CLQ估计值。为了提高CLQ的估计准确性,本研究使用四个评估模型(传统线性模型;偏最小二乘回归PLSR;反向传播神经网络BPNN;以及具有遗传算法优化的BPNN GA-BPNN)来评估CLQ用于确定准确的评估模型。此外,还从五种植被指数(归一化植被指数NDVI;增强植被指数EVI;改良土壤调整植被指数MSAVI;垂直植被指数PVI)和五种植被指数中选择了最佳的卫星指标。土壤校正植被指数(SAVI),以提高CLQ的预测准确性。这项研究是根据高分1(GF-1)数据在中国广东省广州市从化区进行的。使用观察结果比较了传统线性模型PLSR,BPNN和GA-BPNN的预测准确性。结果表明(1)与其他模型(传统线性模型:R = 0.14和RMSE = 91.53; PLSR:R = 0.33和RMSE = 74.58; BPNN:R = 0.50和RMSE = 61.75)相比,GA-BPNN基于EVI的土地状态指数模型提供了最准确的CLQ估计值,R为0.59,均方根误差(RMSE)为56.87,表明CLQ与预测指标之间存在非线性关系; (2)在PSR框架中基于GA-BPNN的CLQ评估方法被驱动使用GF-1数据绘制研究区域的CLQ,导致区域规模的均方误差为61.44,这表明GA-基于BPNN的评估方法具有在大面积上绘制CLQ的潜力。该研究为基于遥感技术的CLQ的高精度预测提供重要参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号