首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparative Evaluation of Two PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD-Max MRSA XT
【2h】

Comparative Evaluation of Two PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD-Max MRSA XT

机译:两种基于PCR的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)检测方法的比较评估:Xpert MRSA Gen 3和BD-Max MRSA XT

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared two walk-away molecular diagnostic assays, the GeneXpert MRSA Gen 3 assay and the BD-Max MRSA XT assay. A total of 119 prospective swabs and 36 culture-positive samples were tested. Xpert MRSA Gen 3 had sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 100% versus 87.5% and 97.1% for BD-Max. The difference in agreement with the enriched culture results was significantly in favor of the Xpert assay (P < 0.02, McNemar nonparametric text).
机译:我们比较了两种分子诊断技术,即GeneXpert MRSA Gen 3分析和BD-Max MRSA XT分析。总共测试了119个预期拭子和36个培养阳性样本。 Xpert MRSA Gen 3的灵敏度为95.7%,特异性为100%,而BD-Max的灵敏度为87.5%和97.1%。与富集培养结果一致的差异明显支持Xpert分析(P <0.02,McNemar非参数文本)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号