【2h】

Book Review

机译:书评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

They all start the same: Americana is dying. Immediately, Macy, Meier and Westhoff tell us, the readers, that this is a tragedy. It has characters, heroes and villains that must be vanquished. Who the villains are, though, varies. Furthermore, how they must be vanquished is left as an open-ended question. Taken together, these three books follow a common narrative of an evil corporation, an unsuspecting population and the ravages of addiction. However, an uncommon thread is who the true villain of the narrative is. Are the villains doctors, the pharmaceutical industry, capitalism or the chemists who created synthetic versions of opioids that have overshadowed what was once a crisis of over-prescription? Further, is focusing on the nuances of villainy the key to explaining the crisis? Not necessarily, though the differences in villainy may indicate why it has been so hard for policy makers, and even the authors of these books, to come to terms with what ought to be done.
机译:他们都是一样的开始:美国快要死了。梅西(Macy),迈耶(Meier)和韦斯特霍夫(Westhoff)立即告诉我们的读者,这是一场悲剧。它具有必须被击败的角色,英雄和恶棍。恶棍是谁,但是,各有不同。此外,如何解决这些问题还有待解决。综上所述,这三本书遵循了一个邪恶的公司,一个毫无戒心的人口和成瘾的肆虐的共同叙述。然而,一个不寻常的线索是叙述的真正反面人物。是反派的医生,制药业,资本主义或化学家,他们创造了阿片类药物的合成版本,从而掩盖了曾经处方过多的危机?此外,关注小人的细微差别是解释危机的关键吗?不一定,尽管反面的差异可能表明为什么决策者,甚至这些书的作者如此难以决定应该做什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号