首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance of the EUCAST Disk Diffusion Method the CLSI Agar Screen Method and the Vitek 2 Automated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing System for Detection of Clinical Isolates of Enterococci with Low- and Medium-Level VanB-Type Vancomycin Resistance: a Multicenter Study
【2h】

Performance of the EUCAST Disk Diffusion Method the CLSI Agar Screen Method and the Vitek 2 Automated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing System for Detection of Clinical Isolates of Enterococci with Low- and Medium-Level VanB-Type Vancomycin Resistance: a Multicenter Study

机译:EUCAST圆盘扩散法CLSI琼脂筛查法和Vitek 2自动化药敏试验系统对中低水平VanB型万古霉素耐药性肠球菌临床分离物的检测性能:多中心研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect low-level vancomycin resistance in enterococci were evaluated in a Scandinavian multicenter study (n = 28). A phenotypically and genotypically well-characterized diverse collection of Enterococcus faecalis (n = 12) and Enterococcus faecium (n = 18) strains with and without nonsusceptibility to vancomycin was examined blindly in Danish (n = 5), Norwegian (n = 13), and Swedish (n = 10) laboratories using the EUCAST disk diffusion method (n = 28) and the CLSI agar screen (n = 18) or the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) (n = 5). The EUCAST disk diffusion method (very major error [VME] rate, 7.0%; sensitivity, 0.93; major error [ME] rate, 2.4%; specificity, 0.98) and CLSI agar screen (VME rate, 6.6%; sensitivity, 0.93; ME rate, 5.6%; specificity, 0.94) performed significantly better (P = 0.02) than the Vitek 2 system (VME rate, 13%; sensitivity, 0.87; ME rate, 0%; specificity, 1). The performance of the EUCAST disk diffusion method was challenged by differences in vancomycin inhibition zone sizes as well as the experience of the personnel in interpreting fuzzy zone edges as an indication of vancomycin resistance. Laboratories using Oxoid agar (P < 0.0001) or Merck Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (P = 0.027) for the disk diffusion assay performed significantly better than did laboratories using BBL MH II medium. Laboratories using Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) agar for the CLSI agar screen performed significantly better (P = 0.017) than did those using Oxoid BHI agar. In conclusion, both the EUCAST disk diffusion and CLSI agar screening methods performed acceptably (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.94 to 0.98) in the detection of VanB-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci with low-level resistance. Importantly, use of the CLSI agar screen requires careful monitoring of the vancomycin concentration in the plates. Moreover, disk diffusion methodology requires that personnel be trained in interpreting zone edges.
机译:在斯堪的纳维亚的多中心研究(n = 28)中评估了用于检测肠球菌中低水平万古霉素耐药性的不同抗药性试验方法。在丹麦(n = 5),挪威(n = 13),瑞典实验室(n = 10),使用EUCAST圆盘扩散法(n = 28)和CLSI琼脂筛查(n = 18)或Vitek 2系统(bioMérieux)(n = 5)。 EUCAST圆盘扩散法(主要误差[VME]率为7.0%;灵敏度为0.93;主要误差[ME]率为2.4%;特异性为0.98)和CLSI琼脂筛查法(VME率为6.6%;灵敏度为0.93; ME率为5.6%;特异性为0.94)比Vitek 2系统(VME率为13%;灵敏度为0.87; ME率为0%;特异性1)好得多(P = 0.02)。万古霉素抑制区大小的差异以及人员将模糊区边缘解释为万古霉素耐药性的指标方面的经验,使EUCAST纸片扩散方法的性能受到挑战。使用Oxoid琼脂(P <0.0001)或Merck Mueller-Hinton(MH)琼脂(P = 0.027)进行磁盘扩散测定的实验室,其性能要优于使用BBL MH II培养基的实验室。使用Difco脑心浸液(BHI)琼脂进行CLSI琼脂筛选的实验室的效果明显好于使用Oxoid BHI琼脂的实验室(P = 0.017)。总之,在检测具有低水平耐药性的VanB型耐万古霉素肠球菌时,EUCAST圆盘扩散法和CLSI琼脂筛查方法均可以令人满意地进行(灵敏度0.93;特异性0.94至0.98)。重要的是,使用CLSI琼脂筛需要仔细监测平板中万古霉素的浓度。此外,磁盘扩散方法学要求对人员进行解释区域边缘方面的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号