首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Microbiology Biology Education >Successful Integration of Face-to-Face Bootcamp Lab Courses in a Hybrid Online STEM Program
【2h】

Successful Integration of Face-to-Face Bootcamp Lab Courses in a Hybrid Online STEM Program

机译:在混合在线STEM计划中成功整合了面对面的训练营实验课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Microbiology and Cell Science program at the University of Florida compressed two standard 16-week lab courses into five-day versions of the course, which are referred to as bootcamp labs. The bootcamp labs have the same objectives, activities, and assessments as their traditional counterparts. Development of the bootcamp labs was part of a larger effort to increase access to the major, and more broadly STEM, by offering a 2+2 hybrid online transfer program. The results of this mixed-methods study include a direct comparison between bootcamp and traditional lab format as an approach for delivery of a face-to-face lab course. The bootcamp lab cohort has a greater diversity of students, with more women and underrepresented minorities in STEM than the traditional semester-long cohorts. Students in the bootcamp labs have comparable grade outcomes and learning gains to students in traditional lab format. Regression analysis identified GPA, but not lab format, as the most significant predictor of success for students enrolled in lab courses. Qualitative results suggest that the bootcamp format may be a better way than traditional formats to teach microbiology lab. In summary, the results demonstrate that a bootcamp version of a face-to-face microbiology course is just as effective as the traditional semester-long version. This work has broader implications as it supports the bootcamp lab approach as a model in STEM education for increasing access and for overcoming a major barrier to online STEM programs: face-to-face delivery of key lab courses.
机译:佛罗里达大学的微生物学和细胞科学计划将两个标准的为期16周的实验室课程压缩为为期五天的课程,这被称为“训练营实验室”。训练营实验室的目标,活动和评估与传统实验室相同。训练营实验室的开发是通过提供2 + 2混合在线转移计划来增加对主要,更广泛的STEM的访问的更大努力的一部分。这项混合方法研究的结果包括直接比较训练营和传统实验室形式,作为提供面对面实验室课程的一种方法。与传统的学期研究组相比,训练营实验室研究组的学生种类更多,在STEM中有更多的女性和少数族裔。训练营实验室的学生与传统实验室形式的学生在成绩和学习收益上具有可比性。回归分析将GPA(而不是实验室形式)确定为参加实验室课程的学生成功的最重要预测指标。定性结果表明,训练营格式可能是比传统格式更好的方法教微生物学实验室。总而言之,结果表明,面对面微生物课程的训练营版本与传统的半学期课程一样有效。这项工作具有广泛的意义,因为它支持将训练营实验室方法作为STEM教育的一种模式,以增加访问量并克服在线STEM程序的主要障碍:面对面交付关键实验室课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号