首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Sensitivity to Experiencing Alcohol Hangovers: Reconsideration of the 0.11 Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Threshold for Having a Hangover
【2h】

Sensitivity to Experiencing Alcohol Hangovers: Reconsideration of the 0.11 Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Threshold for Having a Hangover

机译:对经历酒精性宿醉的敏感性:重新考虑有宿醉的0.11%血液酒精浓度(BAC)阈值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The 2010 Alcohol Hangover Research Group consensus paper defined a cutoff blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.11% as a toxicological threshold indicating that sufficient alcohol had been consumed to develop a hangover. The cutoff was based on previous research and applied mostly in studies comprising student samples. Previously, we showed that sensitivity to hangovers depends on (estimated) BAC during acute intoxication, with a greater percentage of drinkers reporting hangovers at higher BAC levels. However, a substantial number of participants also reported hangovers at comparatively lower BAC levels. This calls the suitability of the 0.11% threshold into question. Recent research has shown that subjective intoxication, i.e., the level of severity of reported drunkenness, and not BAC, is the most important determinant of hangover severity. Non-student samples often have a much lower alcohol intake compared to student samples, and overall BACs often remain below 0.11%. Despite these lower BACs, many non-student participants report having a hangover, especially when their subjective intoxication levels are high. This may be the case when alcohol consumption on the drinking occasion that results in a hangover significantly exceeds their “normal” drinking level, irrespective of whether they meet the 0.11% threshold in any of these conditions. Whereas consumers may have relative tolerance to the adverse effects at their “regular” drinking level, considerably higher alcohol intake—irrespective of the absolute amount—may consequentially result in a next-day hangover. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 0.11% threshold value as a criterion for having a hangover should be abandoned.
机译:2010年酒精宿醉研究小组的共识文件将血酒精浓度的临界值(BAC)定义为0.11%,这是毒理学阈值,表明已经消耗了足够的酒精来产生宿醉。临界值是基于先前的研究,并主要应用于包含学生样本的研究中。以前,我们表明对宿醉的敏感性取决于急性中毒期间(估计的)BAC,在较高的BAC水平下,有较大比例的饮酒者报告宿醉。但是,相当多的参与者还报告了宿醉在相对较低的BAC水平上。这使0.11%阈值的适用性受到质疑。最近的研究表明,主观中毒,即所报告的醉酒的严重程度,而不是BAC,是宿醉严重程度的最重要决定因素。与学生样品相比,非学生样品的酒精摄入量通常低得多,并且总体BAC经常保持在0.11%以下。尽管这些BAC较低,但许多非学生参与者仍会感到宿醉,尤其是当他们的主观中毒水平很高时。当在饮酒时导致宿醉的饮酒量大大超过其“正常”饮酒量时,无论它们在任何这些条件下是否满足0.11%阈值,都可能是这种情况。消费者在“常规”饮酒水平下可能会对不良反应有相对的容忍度,而无论绝对量如何,酒精摄入量的大幅增加可能会导致第二天的宿醉。综上所述,这些发现表明应放弃0.11%阈值作为宿醉的标准。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号