首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Behavioral Addictions >Beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking
【2h】

Beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking

机译:超越关于工作成瘾的神话:就定义和发展趋势达成共识以进行有关过度劳累的未来研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an unprecedented collaborative effort to integrate the existing knowledge on work addiction and delineate trajectories for future studies, several papers from work addiction researchers (including some of the most prolific experts in the field) have contributed to the debate on the misconceptions/myths about this problematic behavior. On the basis of the overview of the presented arguments, the most commonly proposed recommendations were that there should be: (a) a general definition of work addiction, (b) the need for more transdisciplinary and integrative approach to research, and (c) propositions regarding more high-quality research. These three aspects are summarized in the present paper. There is a general agreement among work addiction researchers that work addiction is a problematic behavior that merits more systematic studies, which require input and expertise from a wide range of fields due to its complex nature.
机译:通过前所未有的合作努力,将现有的工作成瘾知识和描绘的轨迹整合起来,以供将来研究,工作成瘾研究人员(包括该领域一些最多产的专家)发表了几篇论文,助长了对此的误解/误解的辩论。有问题的行为。在对提出的论点进行概述的基础上,最常提出的建议是:(a)工作成瘾的一般定义;(b)需要更多的跨学科和综合研究方法;以及(c)关于更多高质量研究的建议。本文总结了这三个方面。工作成瘾研究人员之间普遍达成共识,即工作成瘾是一种有问题的行为,应进行更系统的研究,由于其复杂性,需要广泛领域的投入和专业知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号